I get what the hashtag is going for, and I think it's a worthy goal. Still, I like the way the new Ghostbusters was titled. Not "Lady Ghostbusters", just Ghostbusters. Gender wasn't a factor in the title, and from everything I read it wasn't highlighted over-much in the actual movie (still need to find time to go see…

Thing is, they mostly highlight the Donkey Kong Country games and yet ignore the Game Boy Donkey Kong ('94), and the continuing adventures of the original DK and Mario in the Mario vs. Donkey Kong series. Kind of a failing considering how much they talk about the DKC series.

Hey, Id rather they make a four hour movie they have to cut down to half that time than (with a lot of modern comedies) a 15 minute joke that they fluff out to two hours. Seems likely the material will be better (or at least move along at a zippier pace).

Although maybe technically accurate (because English is dumb), there's usually a modifying word in there to indicate a statement like that. For example: The Secret Life Together of Your Pets, which… ugh. That's awful sounding.

Here's what bothers me. More than the trailers. More than the reviews. It's the title — the Secret Life of Pets.

Cell was a budget book as well. Like a lesser Stand. It was, honestly, the book that put me off King — by this point I'd read enough of his work that I could see all the usual beats and tics, and I was bored by large swaths. It's not surprising to me that the movie Cell isn't that great — it's actually achieving…

Go read the Angel and Faith comics. Take some solace in eventual developments…

Well shit, there goes about 85% of the stuff I used to watch week-to-week. Netflix, I love ya, but this fucks up my viewing.

Thank you for saying that. I actually came into the article simply to point that out, but I'm glad someone said it first. ;)

It certainly keeps money (however little it may be in the grand scheme) our of the coffers for their films. If I'm the only one not seeing their films then, sure, drop in the bucket. But the more people that decide not to watch films (or buy games, or read books) by people that do horrible things, then the less of…

Eh, not really.

I think we've all done some bad things at one point or another, sure. But Roman Polanski/Woody Allen bad? Probably not. And if so, I won't watch your movies.

I don't have to eventually think about conflicted feelings — I purposefully chose long ago to not watch Woody Allen flicks. Same goes for Roman Polanski. And Mel Gibson (and on and on)… The movies may be fantastic (arguably less so for latter-day Gibson), but I just can't watch movies from those guys knowing what…

The combo sandwiches they suggested really don't sound that bad. I think it's a limit to what Subway has on offer — if you really want to get gross, you'd have to go to Penn Station…

I couldn't really get a feel for if the gender swapping did anything for the piece or not — the acting was so bad I had to turn it off. What the video does highlight is how strong the acting was in the original.

The short was impossible to understand, and yet it was riveting all the same. The cast and crew should win an award simply for making something this nonsensical into a compelling narrative.

We have those here in Indiana. The State Fair serves 'em every year, and I've never managed to bring myself to eat them. I hear they're basically like super fatty doughnuts (doughnuts themselves already being super fatty, so it's like a doughnut effectively crawled up it's own asshole to pull that off).

I don't ever plan to buy one of these, and yet I can still feel my arteries snapping shut from their very existence.

Why are we seeing the bear's "O" face? That's just wrong, Build-a-Bear!

Well, of course he's a pretender to the James Cameron throne — only man to direct a proper Aquaman movie.