dansnyder
DanSnyder
dansnyder

Everyone has their own preferences, but this is character design that you “love”?....

EXACTLY. He is one of those characters that has no appeal or reason to have around.
There are a few major-fanboys that need it just because he’s a character that has been around for a while, but these are the people that think Lockjaw needs a respectable movie preference.

I feel like 80s cartoons werent’ afraid to traumatize children with the death of our fictional loved ones.

I had a similar experience with this movie and a G.I. Joe episode that haunted me into adulthood. Everyone died; it was an alternate universe or something, but I couldn’t process it—I was 5—I just remembered

Meanwhile at Sony studios, the employee in charge of “The Sinister Six” script ......

“Marvel’s movies are dogshit.”
The overwhelming majority of movie-goers and critics disagree.

Nice. I was already preparing a rant.
Like everyone else on the internet, I only read the first sentence of things.

Yep. When I started reading reviews, I was surprised how similar they were to F4. I had a hunch then that it was a similar situation of a knee jerk reshooting/re-editing to a questional vision making a clusterfuck of a film.

Didn’t Deadpool have 2 X-men sidekicks?

I still find it a cop-out, especially since the Marvel Netflix is starting to feel a little more like the movies (everything comes out at once and then a 2 year gap).

The character development hasn’t been heavy enough in the movies that they couldn’t work around getting a character in there.

Ex. “Hey Daredevil writer,

I’d love to see them pull in more than the 4 solo characters.
If this is “street level Avengers”, use the same pattern as the Avenger movie: 4 solo heroes and 2 new/additional supporting members.

I’d like the 2 to be Hellcat and Punisher, but I will also accept Elektra, or Misty Knight. If they want to introduce an

Nope. Stunner is the only correct answer, unless a fireman-carry face buster is involved. In that case, any variation wins.

I didn’t catch what they were supposed to actually do. I just thought they were both for head jerking, whiplash neck injuries.

I don’t think Orton ever put that much time thinking about it. It debuted looking like a lazy stunner, and became it’s own thing that still feels like a half-assed stunner. I’m going to have to

I find this very surprising. I had brought this up in the io9 comment section a year ago and was skeptical that they could this schedule once it was 2-3 years before seasons.

I’m not sure how it would work production-wise, but it may work better for them to do 3 different short season (5-6 episodes a year).
The shows

Republican Sen Flake on Kaine
“Trying to count the ways I hate @timkaine. Drawing a blank. Congrats to a good man and a good friend.”

They had an uphil climb regardless.
That is the only Marvel show or movie that I haven’t watched. There was nothing about that show that seemed interesting.

Why is the studio still letting him do promotional interviews? It’s not helping.

Meh. Call me when a gay, Hispanic, atheist becomes president.

Good call. So it may be pretty expensive without the cgi flaming head and chain.

I hope to see something of it, but it’s a tough one.
I don’t think there is the audience for a Ghost Rider movie.
And Netflix would be ideal, but they don’t seem to want to pay the cost for a more visual series based on their current stable of shows (blind guy who punches, girl who punches, black guy who punches,

I’m surprised that there hasn’t already been a Ghost Rider Netflix series.
I bet there is an issue with the CGI. They seem to only have enough of a special effects budget for breakaway walls. They showed DD’s “sonar vision” once before hitting budget.