Her husband is a charismatic, two-term president. She had members of her own “impartial” party working against her opponents. She was leaked debate questions in advance of the debate. She was able to dictate the debate schedule and frequency. She was given money by other governments. She wasn’t held to the same…
danonymous
danonymous
“Hate speech?”
Sexist? Are you retarded?
The party tries to project the image that they are impartial. They are not.
Bernie surely was marginalized during the primary by the Democrat party while Hillary enjoyed privilege. I can’t believe that someone on this site can’t see that.
They were marginalizing him during the primary. Crying “rigged” about it makes as much sense as crying “rigged” as it relates to the Russians with the general election.
You poor, naive person.
For the same reason that Trump was included in the GOP primary long past where he should have been - he was popular enough that the Republican party couldn’t ignore him. Bernie had more popular support than those other guys.
You’re welcome! I’m always happy to help those who obviously need it.
Uhhhhh...no. Vote for whoever you fucking want to vote for. If the Dems want votes, they need to clean up their shit and nominate people who don’t suck.
I LOL’d. No she wasn’t. She lost to Trump! And he was clearly an awful choice.
I think that you don’t know how political parties work. It has nothing to do with how long they have known HRC or Bernie. As a member of the party, you’re expected to pay ($) dues to the party. If you want certain positions, you pay more. It’s pay to play. That is why HRC was advanced over Bernie. I also suspect that…
The President doesn’t generally select individual targets. They work with military advisors to set strategic goals. Trump probably didn’t know about this specific bombing or the specific targets any more than HRC would have.
Ironically, he likely would have done more for you than Hillary. I would never have voted for him, but his stance on healthcare is admirable.
This. Exactly.
Clinton lost because she couldn’t get the votes. Advance a candidate who doesn’t suck, and they’ll pull votes from both GOP-centrists AND third-party voters. Against a weak candidate like Trump, any reasonable candidate would have won in the biggest landslide victory ever.
Exactly. They conspired to advance the one candidate with decades of scandalous baggage, and now they blame everyone else for the loss of the election. It must be racism, though. <rolls eyes>
The Democrat party marginalized Sanders before the primaries were finished. The party was actively working with Clinton to advance her over the other Democrat candidates.