They don’t apply to both cases because one has tons of access to items that you wouldn’t order online and the other doesn’t. Why do you assume this is demand based? I’m talking about the article and you seem to be only focused on your own single experience. Just because your campus reacted to demand (according to you)…

Really? Urban vs. rural is the only difference. In the age of the internet the only real demand for physical stores is things like produce and other (mostly) food products that wont ship well, which I can understand for a rural school but not for one in LA. 

Because a rural school faces a different need than one in the middle of LA. One is responding to a real need, the other is profiting off of leases to corporations that benefit from a more captive consumer base.

Yes, your story is absolutely relatable to this story. The University of Southern California is famously located in the middle of nowhere. 

When the for profit college method doesn’t work out, try the for profit campus method! All the benefits of a college education but now with even more debt to repay! 

Nancy Pelosi has nothing to do with federal or state criminal charges being brought against them after Trump leaves office. 

That’s far too much metal and would be a waste. Why not skip straight to barcoding everyone and putting a tracking device under their skin? That would be much more environmentally friendly state surveillance. 

“This is somehow worse than seeing Democratic candidates tear up their Spanish on the debate stage.”

I really don’t like that nickname for the bus because Ms. Frizzle wouldn’t have let this shit go down.

Plus all that extra airflow with the hole in your torso, kind of a win-win situation. 

Nkemdiche probably shouldn’t have insisted on calling his coach Nkliff Nkingsbury. That couldn’t have helped.

Yeah sure, let’s put the company trying to profit of the sales of the plane in charge of the safety oversight of said plane. While we’re at it, let’s put the guy who advocates for companies to oversee themselves in charge of safety oversight for the government. What could go wrong?

I don’t know, Baltimore doesn’t look that dangerous to me. 

“now the beef’s fizzled”

Yeah, sexual predator billionaire gave money to friend, sexual predator politician. No shit. My question is, does this matter at all and do you really want the DNC to return a 25ish-year-old donation?

I’m wondering just how horrible the other takes were that this is the final product.

I would have started with property damage but to each their own, I guess. 

It’s not to me, but obviously this group seems to think it is.

“Disciplinary measures, if there are any, would not be made public, he said.”

“So, it’s very simple. It’s disappointing, yes. I didn’t play the way I wanted to.”