Balboni would laugh at your weakness.

Oh, I get the point... Still looks terribly cheap. :/

Really? I’m not doubting you but I haven’t heard that before? Is there a pic or something I’m missing?

I HATE how much of the grill is blocked off. :/

What specifically “looks expensive” about that interior?

I’m near Chicago and I agree, the Porsche blends right, but only because it’s being driven by every 60 year old fat balding white guy midlife crisis rolling down the street. Only they buy the base, non-S 911, with all the plain trim in various shades of dirty gray.

And you'll be the fastest hairdresser on your block!!

What’s that little red arrowhead in the middle of the deck lid then?

Terminal indeed.

I guess a button and a lever don’t seem very complex to me. It is completely acceptable that a person may have to learn new information before operating anything, safety related especially.

This is absolutely a story of personal responsibility. Many people operate the door just fine.

I don’t think I’m making any excuses. The opposite in fact. The door and safety handle would have worked as designed, but the owner didn’t know how to use it. It’s pretty simple really.

Still. It’s THEIR product THEY are responsible for - weird, bad ideas or not. I found the handle practically before I noticed anything else, so the “nobody” familiar thing is a stretch, it may not be obvious but this in no way means he is not responsible.

I guess it’s just a slippery slope when we start compromising something new because people may be unfamiliar with it.

You are making a lot of excuses for someone who simply didn’t know how a feature on his car worked.

Again with the overly dramatic.

I suppose I just think people should be more responsible for their own actions than you do.

But everything works as designed, including the very clear safety measures.

Good one.

You say a man is dead as if it justifies your argument against the design of a fully functioning door lock.