Most of my friends vote conservative, so I prefer to not chat with them too much.

No, breastfeeding should absolutely not be on Twitch. Not because I’m against breastfeeding, but because when a child is hungry, a parent should get off their ass and go raise their child without this electronic bullshit.

Parties? You still in your 20s?  lol

I don’t get it. 

I’ll change the subject all I want, because your question is rhetorical, unless you’re just incomprehensibly daft.

No, why?

You intentionally put only one of them in italics, as if it had greater importance, and so I responded in kind.  Why did you put only ONE in italics?  Do YOU object to only that one, and agree with the other two?

In accordance with their own law, I’m sure they tried, and I support their attempt.  They were, however, outgunned.

“Disproportionate force” doesn’t really seem like a sticking point when you’re talking about conquest.

And where the disconnect is that *we* are modern people. And what is being done to people seeking asylum here is wrong. We know it was wrong when similar things were done 400 years ago... and we know it is wrong what is being done to this day. Law or not. Slavery is wrong. Murder is wrong. But so is refusing to help…

Allow me to answer your question by shifting it to something more prevalent and more relevant in modern times: Treaties and agreements made with the native people.

What?  Am I wrong about 17th century international dominant powers failing to frown on conquest?

And that makes what was done no better. This is a false justification for things that are wrong to do by any measure of an egalitarian society.

I’m being intentionally obtuse?

It isn’t automatically trolling because you can’t argue your point well.  You expect people to adhere to law from centuries in the future.  Tell me, how many future laws are you currently breaking?

The people that lived here enforced land ownership between each other through force.  How does one go about stealing that which can be, and was, redistributed through force?  That wasn’t just true of the Americas; it was true all over the world.

Is that better?

I have to say, I really appreciate the duality in this article, in the sense that the vessel used to prepare the food is called “Instant Pot”, and Indian food would make me have to run to the bathroom to use the “pot” in an “instant”.

It was arguably not illegal because there wasn’t any observed law that stopped them. There was no international community that stood against it, and in fact, the international community supported this type of thing.

Let me ask you; who created law back then, who enforced it, and how was it enforced?

I expect to be trodden into dust for this, but I don’t get why people are slagging this movie so badly. The CGI is serviceable and not creepy