I’d much rather give you a sourced definition than paraphrasing one; it gives you less wiggle room to weasel your way around me calling you out. I mean, still, kudos on trying to deflect, though it isn’t going to distract me from the fact you didn’t know comprehension and understanding didn’t mean the same thing.

A newborn can’t live by itself, you say — yes it can. It’s “off life support” in the same way we treat people on ventilators vs off them. Precisely the same. A fetus, especially an embryo, is completely different.

Really, isn’t this the best way to handle it? For all his chants of “Drain the swamp!”, the truth is that Trump is the swampiest creature of them all. He wants the attention. He wants to drag people down to his level, and into the muck. Trump thrives on attention, and whether it is good attention or bad attention, it…

Comprehension is defined as the action or capability of understanding something, which you would know, if you could understand and/or comprehend a dictionary.  So who is proving what point?  lol, strong showing, genius.

Agreed, it has to be difficult to catapult to fame because of a role that everyone loves and then that role ends, and you are no longer that character. I feel bad for him, he seems sweet.

Oh, the “lack of reading skills” thing again! That’s fresh and original.

You saying I don’t know what I’m saying, I don’t understand the topic, etc, doesn’t actually make it so.

You made a lackluster argument, I pointed it out, and now your arguments with other people are actually better. Somehow, you think you’re “winning” a conversation in which I improved your argument, not the other way…

Oh, this is about winning and losing now? And you think you’re less desperate for a win?  This is solid gold, my friend.

I can feel the gratitude seeping from you.  You’re welcome.  

No, I’m satisfied that your arguments with others are better now because I told you how to make an argument.  Again, you’re welcome.

I have all the satisfaction I need from this conversation.  Looking at some of the posts you’ve made in response to other contributors, I see where your arguments are now talking about how the “only roast beef” image of Arby’s isn’t valid.  I’m glad you learned from what I was telling you.  You’re welcome.

Hey guys, remember when this meme was good?  Yeah, neither does anyone else.

I’m not arguing the point anymore, am I?

Priceless, I’m sure. Your life has so little meaning, this must be a big deal for you.

Whatever man.  I’m just accepting your apology for being so daft and moving on.

Other than the part where you responded to the initial comment’s inaccurate, obsolete premise that “Arby’s identity is roast beef”, without pointing out that hasn’t been true for years.  So yeah, it sure seems like you lack understanding, if you can’t even call someone out for saying something that is flagrantly…

What part of what I said do you not understand? Your comment was moronic, and basing it on the obsolete notion that Arby’s is just pushing roast beef is moronic.  Come on, you know better than that.

How does it help to read the full conversation, when the conversation is wrong? “Arby’s identity is roast beef” is an obsolete statement; that is no longer their marketing campaign, and it hasn’t been for years now.  Arby’s as a roast beef chain is digging back like... several decades.

How does offering 4 meats “dilute” the premise of them having the meats?  That’s idiotic.

This isn’t a male vs. female issue, it is a conservative vs. liberal issue. Conservative women typically disagree with abortion more than liberal women, and liberal mean typically agree with abortion more than conservative men.

That isn’t always the case though; I typically vote democrat, and lean liberal, but I’ve had…