I was just thinking to myself the other day how I don't see enough blue penises.

Remember kids, every time you say no to abstinence a dinosaur dies.

It's sad that our politicians are so uninformed about the simplest things. On the other hand, should we really be surprised when they don't even read the laws they vote on?

It's not the end of the world. If those guys let themselves be suckers it's their own fault.

To be fair, it depends on how you determine "biggest shopping day of the year." If you go by number of consumers it's definitely a contender for number one. If you guy by dollars spent, as Snopes points out, it isn't. But to be fair, if merchandise is in fact discounted extremely heavily that is going to skew the…

32% of couples agreed on all three questions? Doesn't that mean 68% of couples DIDN'T agree?

This is so true. I work in a job that inherently is somewhat adversarial and calling (or better yet meeting in person) people invariables yields a much better response.

I'm a huge fan of the walking dead but Rick is definitely my least favorite character. His constant attempts to save people just strike me as unrealistic and, to some degree selfish. I'm glad to hear his character is in the process of abandoning that mindset.

So this is what it's like...when doves cry.

A wooden spoon? I thought I was the only one.

That makes sense. I was thinking that if food scarcity is the primary motivation the parents would be killing the male chicks anyway. If there's a flood then food would probably be more scarce than normal necessitating the trimming of the fat, as it were.

I'm a little confused on your logic. If there were enough food to feed all the chicks, wouldn't it stand to reason there would be enough to feed a diminished number of chicks?

The guide should also include a list of the cheapest beers/liquors/box wines for that region of the country.

+1

I just can't believe this won't have any long term consequences.

I understand that if given the choice why the birds pick female. My point is why kill any chicks at all? Unless kill the male chicks somehow increases the liklihood of the females surviving (maybe it does I don't know) then why bother killing them at all? If even a small percentage of the males would have lived…

This study answers the question why only the males are killed but I'm still not clear on why the chicks need to be killed at all. If you leave them all alive, doesn that maximize the total number of chicks that survive?

Sure they do.

Maybe because the economy is in the shitter the protagonist loses his job and is forced to return to a crime to make ends meet.

Sigh...if only I wasn't 29. It would be socially acceptable to have one of these on display in my home. It's ironic too; 15 years ago I probably couldn't afford one.