Because as long as she’s in the race, she gets to fundraise ... and she can use that money after she’s lost on anything she wants.

Their aboutface is more understandable when you realize that they were lying about supporting the military (it was about getting money into the pockets of their donors), anti-commie (that was, and still is, about denegrating anyone who might show concern for their fellow man) and small government (that was just an…

This is “black people using the n-word” discussion in a very slightly different form. It’s all about intent.

She is simply a graduate of the Susan Collins “of course I’m a moderate, just ask me, I’ll tell you” school of politiking.

Getting big “how do you do, fellow kids” vibes from this article.  I’d love to know who the out of touch PR person was who thought this might work.

In the words of the wise Wil Wheaton, “It’s not who you love, but how you love them that matters”

If a person was to search for a particular Daily Mail article about a Texas man suing his wife’s friends regarding his ex-wife’s abortion, they might find a photo of said sad excuse of a man.

He’s such a hero of the right wing victimization complex. “Look what you made me do”

I wanted to make jokes ... but JFC this is so stupid.

Newsflash to Daniel Cameron. Your stance on trans kids is a loser position as well. Not with your base, because right wingnuts have been lied to enough that they believe trans kids are coming to take their lunch money (or something) ... but with the general population.

When I try and express this, I fall back on “I have no problem with faith, it’s organized religion that is a cancer on humanity”. The American Evangelical right has lost what it means to truly have faith.

so, she works in HR (sorry, WORKED in HR) and she’s a shit human being?  That totally checks out.  Never surprises me when some of the worst people come from that background.

Not the question I was really asking, but I worded it fairly poorly, so I’ll try again. You work inside the justice system. So you see things, hear things and are simply aware of stuff that the rest of us don’t have access to.

I’m 100% sure that Trump ordered that the monitor in front of him was larger than his lawyer’s screens.

“he and his colleagues didn’t predict the varying ripple effects of their law” and the right wing grifters that lobbied them / bribed them / threatened them absolutely don’t fucking care.

Not to mention, standard right wing playbook - make wild accusations, offering no proof, as if just repeating a thing enough times will make it true.

So, as a functioning member of “the justice system”, how do you justify the pittance that is offered for actually serving on a jury balanced vs. the fact that people like me - consultants/contractors/however you want to define people in a “don’t work, don’t get paid” situation - stand to lose literally thousands of…

Somewhere, someone opined that “Juries are filled with people too stupid to get out of jury duty”. Wasn’t me, and certainly it’s an oversimplification that totally dismisses people who are actually motivated by civic duty, but agreed it’s not a comfort.

I find comfort in the mantra “50% of the human race has below average intelligence”.

Would have totally failed as a test subject for this. Handed either cup my response would be “Where is the Bailey’s?”.  Coffee tastes ... not good.  But coffee and Bailey’s?  That is delish.