The same thing goes for Back to the Future 2 and 3. Old Biff steals the DeLorean in the future, heads to 1955 to give himself the sports almanac, and then is able to return to the same future where he stole the DeLorean from in the first place. It's impossible, because he changed the past so drastically (ie. 1985 Biff…

Walter has always used music to help him think. That last shot of him listening to the music and staring at the flower was about him remembering something due to the music playing. Perhaps September coded the plan in Walter's brain with a specific song?

Nope. Actually the latest Dr. Who episode "The Angels Take Manhattan" deals with a paradox of a similar nature exactly the way I described it. Because it follows logic AND physics. Unlike the last 5 minutes of Looper.

Look at my responses to acweston if you want more detail. It IS a contrived ending because the writer has written himself into a corner and then breaks his own rules (not to mention the rules of logic and physics) to get himself out of it.

Ah, but Johnson's version of time travel wasn't the Back to the Future version, because even Doc Brown mentioned paradoxes (ie. Old Joe being in the past causes Young Joe to kill himself, therefore Old Joe never exists to go back into the past causing Young Joe to kill himself). In Back to the Future, everything…

SPOILERS!!!! DON'T READ ANY FURTHER IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOVIE!!

Like I said, 'good' adaptation, not great. A great adaptation is the latest version of Judge Dredd in the theaters now. But Kane was enjoyable enough, and as close to any adaptation as we're bound to get from Hollywood.

Oh, and it has nothing in common with "Drive" which was a horrendous movie from beginning to end. At least "Looper" only shoots itself in the foot in last 5 minutes, "Drive" was D.O.A.

I was with the movie all the way up until the ending which doesn't follow a simple chain of logic and invalidates the whole chain of events from happening. All because the writer/director breaks his own established rules in the movie so that he can get the ending he wanted. I'd get into it, but then there'd be…

I thought it was good, enjoyable, and a pretty good adaptation of source material. And at least the ending didn't piss me off like the ending to Looper.

Trying reading all the responses (where I clarified my response) before opening your mouth and showing how big an asshole we already know you are.

Since no one seems to read the responses with this crappy commenting system and I keep getting the same gripes over and over again, here it is yelled out for the cheap seats.

I use stencils (that I create) from time to time in my art, but I prefer freehand. And maybe you should read my response to the other comment for clarification before insulting me, asshat.

I'm not saying that there isn't any creativity in making the stencils. But since this is an article about painting (with a spraycan) and it mentioned Banksy as an example, there is no need for artistic skill to use a stencil. I can teach a monkey to use a stencil, but I can't teach a monkey to create a stencil.

For movies that are in the theater (like Oswald's tweet example) I agree, people should be careful about spoilers because not everyone gets to the theater to see a movie the day it opens. TV shows, on the other hand, are fair game. So you didn't watch the night it aired. Boo hoo. Your loss. It's like dvring the Super…

It still looks like someone who's never painted before. Besides, doesn't Banksy just use stencils? Any idiot can use stencils. No skill is required for that.

They should have called it WINE-O. This actually is a pretty great invention, and I can see the price coming down on the units as it becomes more of an industry standard. Also, if they can create one of these guys that can recognize ripe and ready grapes and pick them, it will really revolutionize not just the wine…

Engadget was reporting that it started at 10pm (their time) and that it was a security guard hitting a worker that caused the riot.

Charlie, I just wanted to say this is the best review (written by someone who actually understands the source material too!) I've read about this movie so far, and I heartily agree. I had a blast finally seeing the real Judge up on the screen in a great movie that moved along very well. My friend who had never heard…

Here's where the "idea" for this "new" series came from: