Mentioning those two phones in a blog, isn't the same as comparing them. That's all that Casey did in this blog post.

Casey, we get it, you don't like anything that doesn't have a piece of fruit on it and costs 2X more than anything else out there.

I knew this was going to be another Gizmodo swallowing Apple's load opinion piece, and this was the first thing that came (no pun intended) to mind.

Not if you're smart and actually use the included security encryption that comes on both the phone AND the wallet app.

Just out of curiosity (really, not trying to be a dick), but you weren't texting or looking at your phone when you got hit by the car, were you?

Just did a quick Google search of the history of both the Pepsi and Coke logo histories (something the author of this...blog post...should have done before writing it) and found that it's about as accurate as his articles about Apple vs Google.

I bartended for a little more than10 years. I used a muddle to make more Old-Fashioneds than Mojitos, and even then they were few and far inbetween. As for the term 'mixologist', we used to use that term as a joke for bartenders who thought a little too highly of themselves. Yes, yes, there's a correct way and a wrong…

Looks like something you'd buy at IKEA for $10, realize that it doesn't have enough light to light the area you put it in, and then went out and bought a real lamp.

I'm not saying that the corkscrew itself is antiquated, just this particular design which no bartender uses unless they only open one bottle every three years or so. Speed openers are not only faster, but easier on the wrists.

Wow. This looks like someone took one of those inventor's commercials seriously, and then made one of the most useless inventions as a result. Outside of the zester and the muddler (both of which are used so infrequently today (unless all you drink are mojitios)), the rest of these items are worthless to a bartender.…

Liman only directed the first movie, which was shaky-cam-free. The other two were directed by Paul "Shaking a camera like a British nanny shakes a small child" Greengrass. Those last two movies need to come with barf bags just so you can watch the shaky cam during the non-action scenes.

Another 'Apple is the Great and Almighty' Gizmodo article?

Sounds like Apple is the one at fault here (and Mat, of course) for the lax security protocols. Relying on numbers you can find just by working in retail and ringing someone up, is horrible security. But then again, relying on a third party to hold onto your data you deem important out in the ether isn't that smart of…

It's not just that, the entire first season when she kept going back and forth about wanting to help the doctor or not, I really wanted someone just to slap her and say 'this is your job now'. It just was kind of trivial her having these 'problems' in the face of what is essentially the apocalypse. Her BF dying was…

Honestly, I really hope they kill off Lourdes. She has had more mood swings and personalty changes than Sybil. Maybe it's the different writers not knowing how to handle the character, or the actress herself...overacting, but whenever she gets on screen I feel like we're wasting time with her. She needs to red-shirted…

Sprint buys back phones and tablets at a pretty reasonable price. They use them for parts or insurance replacements. I've done this a couple of times now over the years, and as a result my last phone only cost me $15 after the trade in of my old phone.

I'm told it's a useless brick. But then again, could just be advertising.

Wait! It uses a screen! Apple will probably sue them for this...

Still not getting why all the hoopla over this 'news'. Someone steals my phone (or I accidentally break it, or lose it, etc.), I remotely wipe it, then I pay $50 to Sprint to get a new phone and download all my stuff onto the new phone. Thief gets a useless brick, I get a new phone. Other than being down $50, I don't…

Did you know that Borges stories were about libraries and labyrinths? Because that wasn't in the paragraphs above.