This is a new 'limited series' called Earth 2. Essentially it's Alan Scott in another universe, not the Alan Scott that everyone is familiar with from the 1940's, etc. This Scott has no weakness to wood (yes, you can insert your own punchline there), and doesn't need a lantern either.

Nope. I saw JC in the theater, love Andrew Stanton's work, but I actually fell asleep a few times while watching it. The whole movie felt very Disney, the characters never really popped off the screen in any memorable way, and the whole thing was just rather bland.

It's got Max Von Sydow as a bad guy in it? I'm down. Looks like harmless fun.

:D

Looks like bad PhotoShopping over the stunt double for War Machine's armor. Complete with added pixel noise that doesn't fit the rest of the picture.

Yeah, still not paying money to see this one in theaters. The first one has all of three action scenes in it, and a painfully bad monologue by Mickey Rourke (complete with closeup where you can see his crack pipe burnt teeth, and watch him drool through the whole minute and a half nonsense). Plus, with a title like…

I'd settle for an actual story without any plotholes big enough to fly the Enterprise through. But then again, what do I know?

Sorry, I worked in Hazmat for over a decade. All that post tells me is that some moron was storing incompatible chemicals next to each other (which regulations forbid, and which people routinely ignore), and the inevitable spill finally happened. Now the naked guy eating the face of another naked guy at the side of…

I'll just leave this here. Watch the whole thing.

To build upon your synopsis, Duncan Jones produced two of the better sci-fi films in the last five years, "Moon" and "Source Code". "Moon" didn't make any money. In fact, Jones has been quoted as saying that the only way he sees any money from that movie, is if someone buys the dvd. Now while "Source Code" did do…

Actually, it wouldn't matter if I did. Putting anything with any intelligence on the big screen is doomed to financial failure from the start. That's why you keep getting reboots and sequels from 20 year old movies.

Frankly, if you realized that American Idol is the number two rated show in the country (falling from number one which is now "Monday Night Football"), you'd realize that the majority of the viewing public have the knowledge of fuckwits let alone the knowledge of real science. That's why Hollywood pretties up sci-fi…

It's not hypocrisy. I've said more than a few times that "Drive" is a badly done homage to Michael Mann's 80's movies. I'm acknowledging why I find this movie to be bad, due to the style it's trying to mimic, yet fails miserably at it. Yet your only retort is that I (and others like me) 'don't understand' what we're…

Go take a look at the video clip you put up next to your caustic post, and rethink that line about who's 'smug jackassery' is worse.

Instead of making insulting comments about someone that doesn't agree with my opinion (*ahem* 'mouth-breathers') about a movie that was a poorly cribbed homage to Michael Mann's 80's endeavors, I'm just going to point out that there are much better movies out there than this one. If you want to see a movie that not…

Dude, I've seen and even liked slow movies before (Jim Jaramush's Dead Man comes to mind) and routinely see movies that are considered "art house" or "indie" films that no one else likes but me, but "Drive" was routinely predictable and dull. No matter how sarcastic of a posting you put up, people aren't going to…

Love it! Kind of feels like a sequel to their old song, "Spaghetti Western" (which is about watching all the old Eastwood westerns on the local (SF Bay Area) tv station).

Gosling isn't real, he's a mannequin. That's why his 'acting' was so wooden.

If you couldn't figure out what was going to happen between the time you meet Perlman's character, and the pawnshop caper, then you obviously haven't seen any movies or read any novels in the last 50 years. It was as predictable as death and taxes is inevitable. The script actually screamed out several times what…

This movie was horrible. I watched it on Netflix last night, and kept wondering when the movie was going to get interesting. A mannequin has more emotive power and better acting ability than Gosling. The Ron Perlman scene on the beach, made me laugh out loud at how bad the movie had become, and I almost thought this…