dade305305
dade305305
dade305305

Yep in Miami at a best by at near dadeland mall.

We can. MvC 1 & 2, Powerstone, and Ready 2 Rumble were the truth.

I had some bullshit similar to that happen to me a a best buy back in the day. I went to best by to check out getting a dreamcast back when they were being discontinued and sold for like $50.

THIS. I was really disappointed that follow up wasn’t asked. 

I know this the root and we supposed to cape up for black folks at all times, but she need to sit in there. She shot a dude in the back of the head while he was and took his wallet. I don’t give a fuck if she was sex trafficked or not.

Oh, I’m 100% certain there are plenty examples to the contrary.

There in lies the rub. I believe it should. If your application lands on a desk and you just happen to be the best candidate, then the job should be yours.

True, but we have no evidence that he is. We know he beat his wife / gf and that’s it. That in and of itself is not enough to say that he has a bias that would effect his job performance in that role.

You do know the article is ALSO about the outrage the author feels about him being hired in the first place. The article speaks to different issues, and my response focuses on one of them. Nothing wrong with that.

It absolutely does not in this case. I’m well aware of what I’m defending. I’m defending the ability for a person ANY person (yes even abusers) to go out and work and so something with themselves after they get out. Yea, I’ll argue that point all day. In this case its a serial abuser.

That’s my point. I’m not arguing for an abuser, though you keep trying to spin it that way. I’m arguing that ANYBODY abuser or otherwise who did there time should be allowed to get a job they are qualified for. That’s it, that’s argument. I’m saying that him being an abuser does not make him any more or any less

Even if it was, doesn’t change notion that once people do their time for a crime and get off paper, they should be getting a clean slate unless legislation demands otherwise (sex offender registries and so on).

Taht’s interesting then. So you either (A) don’t work or (B) just happen to be super lucky and all of your co-workers 100% love you and you all agree on everything. I’m pretty sure if you have a job then there is at least one who worker who does not like you because you’re (insert race, age, gender, religion ,

Because you just described a multiple DV abuser and murderer as a productive member of society.

You seem more worked up than me. I’ve having a discussion with folks, you seem to be the one mad here.

You did time? Sorry about that.

Why? You don’t believe that people can leave their personal feeling at the door and do a job? Do you think he’s going to go “this woman has a good business plan, her numbers look good, looks like it will create a few decent paying jobs....buuuut, I hate these bitches so I’m gonna deny the loan.” You really think that’s

I agree if you you have a certain crime and a specific job requires you have have heavy sometimes intimate (counseling, etc.) interaction with the type of person the victim is (women, child, elderly) then you can’t do it. But by using your logic any job that even tangentially brings a person into contact with a

Sure I would. Because I don’t subscribe to the once a murderer always a murder mindset. People do shit, and sometimes they go, “you know what fuck this shit, let me do something with myself”. And they do.

It doesn’t actually. I actually have a record AND a public sector position. That said even before I had a record I’ve been a proponent of once your sentence is done, its done.