To each their own but I'm with you. Aren't games supposed to be fun? Besides, my time is short as it is, I'd rather spend it on something else. If this is your thing, go for it, I just don't get it.

Saying you can marry whomever you want means "you can marry whomever is eligible". Unfortunately in our twisted society you have to add those qualifiers, there was a time when you didn't.

And you guys wonder why Republicans don't want to work with you? Why there is so much partisanship in this country? You don't think your hatred and intolerance have anything to do with it???

Which is the same thing people thought about the pro-life movement, but they've been gaining serious ground. People make poor prophets.

What conservative majority???? Far too many SCOTUS decisions come down to which side of the bed Anthony Kennedy wakes up that morning, right or left.

-_- Loving v Virginia is about interracial marriage. If you want to make the claim that it thus validates SSM, you can feel free to but SCOTUS had the opportunity to do just that with the Prop 8 case and chose not to. For the final time, it is *currently* up to the states. This is not an issue that is debatable! …

Ah, the usual tolerant liberal way of handling things. Call people nasty names. *sigh* -_-

Bro, these are just plain facts. If what you were saying was true then there wouldn't still be court cases about state marriage amendments happening.

Now if you want to interpret a SCOTUS decision to mean that, great, haul your butt to court and make that case but as it stands right now each state is making their…

No, SCOTUS is as of now leaving it to the states. They just ruled against DOMA and that applied to the federal gov't only. As it stands right now each state can make their own marriage policy and is not obligated to accept gay marriages from another state.

The Civil Rights Act happened through the democratic process. Contrast that with Roe v Wade, where SCOTUS decided they would make up their minds for the country. One is clearly a better way to handle contentious issues.

Where is the "right to marry any person or persons" inscribed in our laws or Constitution?

Wow, that must be quite the college you attend. Far too many colleges these days are less interested in honest and open debate and more interested in pushing their ideological positions.

I would agree. I think the issue should just be left to the states or handled through a constitutional amendment (which is highly unlikely). If left to the states, some will allow it, some won't, if the stance of the state you're in really bothers you, move. I have my own opinion of how the country should be run…

Texas has gone from 44 abortion clinics to 6. Progress.

Everything is politics these days, it gets so tiring. Video games are supposed to be an escape from real life.

The majority of the states that define marriage as one man, one woman, would like a word with you.

Go Nintendo.

You know that SCOTUS can overturn poor decisions its made in the past right? Has happened before. o_O

This. Especially since now he is talking about some kind of vague new direction or something and makes it sound like it might be fitness-related. Say what? The man just seems completely out of touch with what customers actually want, the fact that their sales numbers were so unrealistically high for so long should…

I'm sorry, but giving our massive federal spending and debt, the idea that gov't agencies are underfunded just strikes me as so ludicrous as to be unbelievable. Big Gov't hasn't worked because somehow, magically, conservatives have undermined it. I mean, if you're willing to believe that, you'll believe anything. …