cynicalmama
cynicalmama
cynicalmama

Did you seriously just link to a Michael Jackson support site?

Here is a thought experiment.

Lets say someone had an envelope that contain irrefutable proof one way or the other that Jackson was or was not a pedophile.

And that person has a briefcase with 2 million dollars.

If you guess correctly you get the 2 million dollars.

Knowing that Jackson was a drug addled, with huge

No it isn’t, there’s no real contortions required to prove that Robson and Safechuck are blatant con artists trying to milk money from MJ’s estate(and don’t play the “oh but they weren’t paid for the documentary therefore they MUST be telling the truth” card on me, free publicity for them more then makes up for not

Jesus Christ dude. You’re spending a lot of time on here defending a man that wouldn’t give a shit about you (I’m assuming you’re older than 11). They should make a HBO documentary on you, you have Michael Jackson’s dick so far down your throat. Smh

lol. You’re acting like Michael Jackson is a regular black man the feds are out to get. Yes, he’s black (technically anyway), but he’s insanely wealthy and powerful. He ran around in the same circles as some of the most powerful people in our society. He has more in common with rich white people than most black people.

So now we are trusting the law enforcement agencies of the US federal government? 

I don’t believe he is, Robson and Safechuck are simply not credibly to me no matter how much they like to turn up the crocodile tears, they’ve changed their stories so many times now I cannot believe them, and after the Smollett fiasco i’ve got a feeling their stories will be getting quite a bit of well-deserved

FBI and LAPD investigating and choosing not to bring charges DOES NOT mean “innocent.”  It means they didn’t think the cases were winnable, particularly in the face of Jackson’s wealth and what that meant for his legal defense.  None of that means innocent.  None.

And OJ didn’t slaughter two innocent people because a court found him not guilty, right?

...and yet police carted out boxes of porn:

Whatever Tito.

The FBI doesn’t find people “innocent.”  It can find there isn’t enough evidence to pursue criminal charges, which isn’t the same thing.

If you have to search for a recognizable user name, the safe bet is trolling. Topics like this bring them out in droves.

Are you STILL out here banging this drum? I feel like you’d feel more welcome on some twitter echo-chamber.

I’ve noticed the weird syntax too. May be Russian bots...and I am only half joking.

I think the sad truth is that a lot of his defenders are also victims of sexual abuse in their own lives. They have to call it a lie otherwise they have to come to terms with what was done to them.

It is terrifying.

Maybe because I’m a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, but for some reason I have always believed he was guilty. Always. I loved Michael as a musician; grew up on the Jackson 5; had a total crush on him; was in total breathtaking awe when Thriller came out, and I saw the video; and still to this day talk about his

What terrifying are the people still defending him. Every article I read about this documentary fills up with people defending him (with some pretty odd syntax). I don’t know what the point is of that but his defenders are hardcore.