Congrats, what I wrote still stands. You’re one of a select few who do so. Like I said, a lot of domestic travelers don’t. If you have no reason to go international, there’s not really much of a reason to get a passport.

A lot of domestic travelers don’t bring passports because they don’t expect to lose their driver’s license...

Hahaha. If you think the caparison stands, you should be examined by a psychiatrist. Nowhere NEAR the same and does not translate to each other at all. If you think storytelling is the same as real life physical harm/murder to another person, that’s scary.

Not even close at all. NOBODY deserves violence or murder. Ever. This is a work of entertainment that can go in virtually any direction. And we have no entitlement to it. Sorry, but equating physical violence and murder to the choice of storytelling is completely wrong.

Please, forward me his info. I’ll get some of my economist friends to discuss it with him. They’ll laugh their ass off, probably.

Your dumbass concept rides on the fact that any action doesn’t not mean there is a reaction.

HAHAHA. Yeah, no. Economists would say you’re wrong. I’d encourage you to talk to one.

That wouldn’t be harassment (the result of killing his income. The methods may be illegal). It would be capitalism at work. Morally questionable? Maybe. But definitely not harassment. Just pure capitalism. That’s business. Think of it as an online protest (as long as you’re not doing something illegal).

HAHAHAHA. Please tell me where morality is a different field of study. Is it moralitology? Seriously, you need to read up on the subject you’re trying to make a point of. I’m glad that my undergrad apparently is SOOOOO wrong, according to you. Apparently morality is NOT part of the study of psychology (which is part…

I’d invite you to takes psychology classes (seriously, you should if you’re going to try and talk with authority). You have it wrong.

Lol. Sorry do you think you just made some kind of grand slam argument? If so you should spell it out more clearly because as far as I can tell you’re only helping me make my point.

Soooo... Again, please tell me again what legal rights drugs and prostitution is preventing on others. Those are illegal practices that are always wrong. I’m talking about LEGALLY infringing on other people’s rights. Again, tell me what subset of people are being sought to be LEGALLY infringed on?

But as we all know, in common use the word bigot is used to refer to anyone who treats people differently according to things like their sexual orientation, ethnicity, etc.

You do realize my point, right? Immoral is your opinion. It doesn’t infringe on others’ rights. Please, tell me what huge subset of people that blow directly infringes on someone’s rights? Or a hookers? Sure, maybe the people who use and abuse. But who else does that directly infringe on rights? Please tell me how…

“I found all the social justice boycotting to be a very bigoted act”

Not even a close comparison. Blow and hookers doesn’t affect a whole subset of people. Using your money on blow and hookers doesn’t infringe on anyone else’s rights. VERY simple difference.

They’re not boycotting because of just simply religious beliefs of Chick-fil-a. They actively put money into anti-LGBT groups.

LOL. You’re proving what others have said. They talk about giving opinions with out being an asshole, and you prove it with “fucking moron.” There’s a big difference for criticizing and being a dick about it. You’re condescension is quite apparent.