Is he actually trying to make a point doing it, though? The only time i can find where he actually had an explicitly stated altruistic goal for doing this was when he set up bots to track Russian Oligarchs after the Ukraine invasion to possibly help have those assets seized. The rest of the time, there doesn’t seem to…

This falls under ‘can’ vs ‘should’. Can he post all this publicly available information in a way that allows people to track these famous people in near real-time? Sure. Should he? Unless he’s trying to make a political/sociological/etc point, then probably not. At that point, he’s just being creepy and/or trying to…

That’s the thing, this judge says that all of that doesn’t matter because the law, when looked at by itself, wasn’t unconstitutional. If the next judge/panel agrees with this judge, all of that you point out is irrelevant.  The only way Disney can win is by proving to the next judge/panel that the intent behind the…

*Looks to see the last time Jesus narc’ed to the authorities when someone did something that didn’t agree with his delicate sensibilities.*

Way to keep ignoring the point being made by focusing on the one thing no one here is talking about because that’s the only point you have to argue with, despite it being besides the point.

The republican party has spent years gaslighting its constituents and making them distrustful of any source of info that wasn’t controlled by them, then made them fearful and angry at anything and everything that doesn’t fit into their tiny mold of “proper” thinking.....then lost control. The reality-denying, delusiona…

More damning than being appointed by Trump is the fact that this judge is also a member of the Federalist society....literally a cabal of lawyers and judges intent on changing laws and judicial precedent to change society to their liking who think the constitution should be taken literally to the point of stupidity.

It’s funny/sad how many “Christians” in the US have absolutely no idea what Jesus actually stood for. Remember reading an article not too long ago about pastors being worried because so many long-time churchgoers were complaining to them that the “turn the other cheek” messaging “makes them look weak”...as if that…

The law whose constitutionality is in question, and which this lawsuit is based on, is the law that removed the special district, not the Don’t Say Gay bill.

The judge is saying that it doesn’t matter why Desantis passed the law as long as the law itself is constitutional.  It’s a really dangerous position to take, but the conservatives on the bench across the country, particularly the ones who are members of the Federalist Society, have shown absolutely zero regard for…

This one is a bit tricky and takes some weird logical leaps. As i understand it, the judge is basically saying that the law itself, regardless of how it came to be, wasn’t unconstitutional. Disney is arguing that the law is unconstitutional because it was passed in an attempt to suppress their corporate free speech,…

How much training, exactly, would pilots have to go through in order for bolts that should have been tightened and pins that should have been inserted on the factory floor to fix themselves mid-flight and not cause those specific problems found on the Max 9s?

Why is it that we always seem to have someone going out of their way to smear the messenger in these cases as if that somehow renders their message null and void? Does Pierson’s connections somehow magically make the fact that Boeing delivered a plane that wasn’t put together properly and caused a near catastrophic…

The cancer analogue used to describe post Friedman capitalism is apt. It’s mind boggling that so many in this country still idolize his perspective despite the devastation it’s wrought to the American middle class and our society as a whole...willful blindness

The infuriating part of this whole thing is that many of these jobs may have been saved with Bobby Kotick’s golden parachute, but modern capitalism is ruthless.

Where are you getting this info? Anecdotally, the people I know of who were impacted by this decidedly weren’t contract workers so wondering why you’re stating this with such authority.

Yeah, that’s exactly what he’s doing

This. As long as cops don’t ever have to face any consequences for their misconduct, policing in this country will continue to be broken. Have independent third parties not in bed with police handle these investigations and force cops and their unions to pay for settlements related to their own conduct rather than the…

Germain being right that Brian sitting out these situations would be out of character as established in the earlier films doesn’t change the fact that he took a fairly misogynistic route in making that point.

Given how Square Enix can’t leave well enough alone and keeps having to mess with things that should just be a straight update (the party level cap added to their latest Tactics Ogre rerelease, for instance), I’m perfectly fine with Square choosing to ignore this game which is one of my cornerstone games.