cutty-snark
cutty-snark
cutty-snark

What Ted Cruz fighting a dildo might look like:

This could be my all-time favorite implementation of "If you see something (awful), say something."

Note to Lin-Manuel Miranda: you need another title for your musical version of "Hamlet." "To Be Or Not To Beyoncé" ain't gonna fly. #Hamletunes

Headlines: "Ride or Die Chick Rides with Deadly Apparatchik!" and "Model and Mommy Marries Malevolent Mummy!"

#ByeAnita and #McGITMcGinty

Puh-muthafuckin-REACH.

Me? I don’t go all ragey about her in relation to Cobain. I’m not a huge fan of the casual racism she tosses around.

C’mon, I can’t be the only one who’s amazed this this burnt orange butthole actually used the words “enabler” and “seedy”. I mean, those are words other than “disaster,” “huge,” “terrible,” “terrific,” "loser," "low energy," and "the best."

I have nothing but unabashed, unbounded love for her. She's stupidly talented, extremely intelligent, and aware of the power of her words and actions. I can support all of those qualities all day long.

Praise White jesus! FINALLY there's a place where white people can find other white people!

Considering the recent article about shrooms making you permanently “more open,” if she announced her intent to shroom it up, I would stop my life, make popcorn, and just camp online to see what she would do next. ‘Cause the shit that followed would be AWE-INSPIRING.

And like Wu Tang, the SEC ain't nothin' to fuck with.

Not to mention there will now be a 40% chance of Biddle. No thanks.

In light of that, your response comes across as less of an attempt to answer my question, and more of an attempt to make a pet point that is applicable to a fraction of the efforts of the groups I mentioned. So.

That particular instance (banning based on appearance) does pop up from time to time; but these groups all support MANY other measures that enjoy widespread support, such as expanded background checks. So I’m not sure how a single plank in a platform equates to being far from the middle. The only way that assessment

That’s an interesting take; but not one of the five organizations I listed is pushing for a total ban; and in most cases, have proposed some pretty sensible changes that could have real impact. So I’m not sure they’re so far from the middle.

I’ve long wondered why the various gun control groups can’t unit and pool their efforts in some coordinated way. On the "2nd Amendment Rights at All Cost" side, you have the NRA. On the other side of the debate you have Americans for Responsible Solutions, the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, Moms Demand Action, the

Separated at birth?

Yeah, that picture though. RAWR!