What are you talking about? Sanders’ top staff from the 2016 election literally just walked because Sanders refused to make his launch video about himself.

CNN on Wednesday admitted it failed to disclose the Democratic Party ties of audience members who asked questions during its recent Sen. Bernie Sanders town hall.

Oh, did Sanders “poison the well,” like so many other Jews?

Aren’t all Democrats “only in the party” because they can “get something”? It’s a political machine with access.

Sanders did more campaign stops for Clinton in the Midwest (“Rust Belt”) states than Clinton did herself.

What? Sanders last 2.5 years have been better than any other candidate currently running or considering. Few can match his level of accomplishments.

Because Sanders had next-to-none name-recognition while Clinton is one of the most known female politicians of our generation.

CA and NY had a host of electoral issues that disenfranchised tens of thousand of potential Sanders voters. Now that his campaign is established much sooner than last time we’ll be better prepared and more likely to win.

I’m not sure, but I can definitely make a note of it so we can follow-up in a year!

Sanders has a strong base of women and PoC supporters that will most definitely help him win the South. It’s actually kind of racist for your to erase the many, many marginalized supporters of the Sanders campaign. It’s bigger than him.

It won’t be as difficult this time for Sanders to win a majority of delegates because there’ll be more candidates.

Sanders was running against Clinton in ‘16. Now that there’s no Clinton, the black vote has no candidate to consolidate behind.

Do you follow /r/AskHistorians? There’s been several discussions on the Roman Empire and its Emperors that specifically delves into the propaganda involved in regime change.

It’s not about inability to grow it. This was literally the style of the time. There’s even historical records that recommend a clean-shaven face to prevent an enemy from grabbing the beard during battle; a “neckbeard” is a purely ceremonial statement that preserves masculinity and maintains defense strategy.

It’s not necessarily a bad thing, but it’s not exactly reparations either. This is why Sanders knows the concept of reparations is divisive because its an effective, confusing cudgel of identity politics.

Why specify pitbull owners when pitbulls are no more likely to maul a child than any other breed of dog?

Leftists in the U.S. also want a leftist president to pack the court. What’s your point?

The U.N. and Red Cross condemn the U.S. providing “aid” to Venezuela specifically because it could lead to exactly what happened. This is on The United States, not Maduro.

Why would you mention Harris’ Jamaican father as evidence against black heritage when it’s Harris’ mother that is Tamil Indian and the heritage that Harris seems to be ignoring?

This is a great piece that explains exactly how the concept of reparations is divisive and a useful cudgel for preventing any real change: