I don't think that's how this works. The judge can only consider the charges before him. He can't just decide the defendant is guilty of something else.

I know the judge in this case and he hates that he had to make this decision. But it is consistent with the laws on the books right now - which were enacted before cellphones with cameras existed. However, my understanding is that there is a bill being introduced this legislative session to fix this issue so the…

Is there some contest going on that I'm unaware of? Who can be the biggest shit in the history of shits, or something?