I’m thinking it’s a mad-libber style form letter.

Wouldn’t vacating migrant workers from unskilled labour sectors constitute job creation?

I’m not surprised. After all, the road apple doesn’t fall far from the horse’s ass.

I can sort of see the resemblance. Personally, I think he looks like Malekith:

“I’m not poor. I’m just pre-rich.”

Doncha know?

Eh, no. He straight up assigned blame on her and pretty much said that she got what she deserved. There was no search for an explanation in his statement. That much is clear.

Or you could take your own advice, right? Right. Glad to be of help!

And I thought the initial comment to which he responded was clear as being a derisive remark about the defendant’s ignorance/disrespect towards the anatomy of consent and not about the actual physiology of female sexuality.

Disproportionate outrage? Not at all. I would say I'm being fairly respectful, so the tone policing is not necessary. I was confused as to how he gleaned that it was simply an issue if penis size from the comment to which he was responding. I’m not doubting painful sex due to penis size is an issue. It’s just not the…

The quote he responded to did not actually mention that at all. Just that the defendant feigned cluelessness to female sexuality. I am not doubting pain experienced during sex due to size at all. I'm questioning as to why the hell is it brought up in the first place as a passing thought COMPLETELY unrelated to the…

That’s my point. Your anecdote disputed nothing and it was out of place. Discomfort in consensual sex is not uncommon and is not the issue here. He was indifferent to the victim’s discomfort and her pleas to stop.

Maybe your anecdote would be more suited if the article was about that topic at hand.

I’m wondering how you came to the decision on drawing on your own personal experience as a reference is in anyway appropriate and sensible on an article about a rape in the first place.

Therefore, the issue of his penis size and relative discomfort it cause in the context of her attack is pointless. She was raped. THAT’S what caused the discomfort.

That dude’s remark was as subtle as a poke in the eye. An odious combination of sociopath and simpleton.

Well, yes. That wouldn’t be impossible if the sex was consensual to begin with. He claims it to be so because that is central to his defence strategy. And based on the victim’s testimony, the sex wasn’t consensual. Which is why your comment confused me.

Reading that fucking sociopath’s testimony was like staring into the abyss.

I’m not following your point. What does your comment have to do with the rape discussed in the article?