this article is very slanted, but the actual charges show that the police claim he was speeding with no lights on, then refused to stop. I have no idea whether he was or wasn't, but that is the answer to your question.

I will check for something general. Precedent has shown that a badge, uniform, and a marked car are sufficient ID.

Here is the applicable section of the code.

They need to know the laws in the state in which they are traveling.

They think the police are required to show three forms of ID. I wonder if they believe all urban legends.

Doesn't matter... This was a Terry stop in a stop and identify state. The officers were not required to provide additional ID, but he was required to comply.

No... He was not. Three forms is an urban legend that is NOT TRUE. Uniformed officers in marked cars are not required to provide additional ID, especially not before a detainee is made secure.

I actually think we would get along once you stop judging others based on what you think is "cool"... And when you buy a watch. Like a grown up.

you just said douchenozzle... You have lost all sense of dignity.

I have a movado without numbers. If you can't tell time on it, it might say more about you than the watch. It really isn't that difficult.

you're a child who doesn't understand that class is timeless and rare, but will always be noticed by those who appreciate such things.

you should take a survey among women your age if they think a guy wearing a very nice watch is classy and attractive or not.

damn, you're a dick. Can't even chuckle at a little joke.

I actually don't care whether you think someone is a douche... From your posts, you might be one yourself.

you have it completely wrong. Let me ask you this... Did your grandfather wear a watch? Was he a douchebag?

are you aware that most women (and all strippers) evaluate you immediately upon meeting you by checking out your shoes and your watch?