Right but what “home-court advantage” means isn’t “a guarantee that you’ll never lose at home,” but rather “theoretically you can win the series without having to win another road game.”

“We like to sing ‘Don’t fence me in’ while eating our Cheeky Nandos and reminiscing of the days when Starbucks was just a single independent coffee shop down by the Pier.”

As a Raiders fan, all I can say is...

Pope Thrower v. Storm Duck is just heartbreaking. 

Thank you for this - all I wanted in this thread was a LSFYL reference.

VAR ruined the entertainment value of that game only for City. If you are a Tottenham fan (COYS), that moment when the ruling came down and the souls left the bodies of Sterling and Pep was fucking amazing. If you are a neutral, it was also amazing for you, as so many neutral fans and commentators and writers have…

Billy.  Billy Haisley is complaining about the result.

Yeah, I also don’t get this line:

Context does matter, but you are picking and choosing what context matters to you. As it stands, white people wearing dark makeup to appear black is the continuation of a practice tied to the mocking of black people, and often enslaved Africans, in the US. That’s the context for this. More context for this, which a…

If by “nothing,” you mean blackface, then, yes; it is not allowed.

Did you skip the first paragraph?

“Gee, I’ll bet you’re fun at parties” says local man with multi-paragraph rebuttal to sports argument

;)

And their backup quarterback? You guessed it.

What rhetoric? Are you fucking kidding? She’s pointing out basic objective facts and people are threatening to kill her. Who the fuck ungreyed you?

Counter-Counterpoint: It looks awful.

In the AAF, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups. The players who were suckered into wasting months of their life, and the owners who will somehow cash out and profit on an obvious disaster. These are their stories.

That’s a pretty common way for that to be written.

Michigan alumni are so pissed they haven’t been caught up in this yet.

Sorry, “asking in good faith” sometimes resembles asking in bad faith these days. I agree with your perspective... It’s one thing for us to hold her to a higher standard for the words she chooses moving forward as an elected public official; it’s another thing to condemn her as an antisemite and ignore her valid critiq…

Except that they weren’t, and you falsely saying they are doesn’t make it so, any more than what the protestors are inaccurately and inappropriately lobbing at Clinton. You should submit to your own “advice” for them.