These same dipshits loved Tebow’s obnoxious religiosity, despite him being a shit QB too. The skill argument is just a lazy retcon.

“Things are somewhat less oppressive than they were, so why aren’t you lesbians grateful?”

AOC’s wing is going to have to win a lot of primaries and general elections to have anything like the number of seats required to choose the speaker. Maybe higher turnout in 2020 will enable that, but the left wing primaries in 2018 had pretty low success rates. A lot of people have learned from Crowley’s failure to…

Heitkamp was dead in the water regardless. I sincerely doubt that coming out swinging against the president’s immigration policy was going to win her any voters in North Dakota.

Well, threatening to primary every rep who doesn’t agree with you isn’t what most people would call being cooperative. They don’t need to vote with Pelosi, but they at times do act like they are owed more control than their amount of seats would allow.

Yeah, this is a fair point. Beyond that, her group is incredibly small - I recognize that her ideas are popular among the extremely-online, but they’re going to have to actually win a lot more seats if they want power. That’s the game.

This is the sort of BS that has prevented me from getting this, or any of the other recent AC games. The game has clearly been engineered to be a slog so you buy upgrades. No thanks.

“nobody has been able to quantify the effects of CO2 on climate change ACCURATELY”

Not a single one of those is an instance of him issuing an EO to directly contradict a SCOTUS ruling.

Women love comically oversized dress shirts and self-done haircuts.

I was about to mention that - that guy looks like a total Melvin between the oversized shirt and the quasi-bowl cut.

Why don’t they just import the T-Roc? It even already has almost the same name.

It’s not a good look when someone can’t attack an argument and resorts to personal attacks instead.

Obama never issued an EO to overrule a SCOTUS ruling. Your false equivalence is pathetic.

“I don’t think such an argument exists.”

The electoral college isn’t changed by gerrymandering unless a state splits its electors by district (only Maine and Nebraska do this). Winner-take-all electoral votes are the problem there.

This is why you get ad hominems instead of serious discussion. Those values have been established through hundreds of peer-reviewed papers based on rock solid physics. We know the absorption spectra of CO2 - the rest is math. The fact that you, a layperson, has not been sufficiently educated in science or bothered to…

“Logic and facts” like “Scientists don’t know this thing that hundreds of peer-reviewed papers have been published on over several decades, which I claim to know despite having not read any of the relevant literature, but because some right-wing talking head told me and I believed it.” That kind of logic and facts?

She is absolutely on the left of the party’s average. Dumping her will not move that needle much.

This is just another example of extremely-online people failing to understand that most districts don’t look like Twitter.