Are you presuming Biden wouldn’t lead us into war?
Are you presuming Biden wouldn’t lead us into war?
Uhh, the House doesn’t approve judicial nominees. You’re thinking of McConnell.
Crowley was not a blue dog. This ranking puts him at #352 from most conservative to most liberal. He was pretty well in the middle of the pack for Democrats.
your candidates have spoken, loudly, on national television, about opening the borders and giving illegals free healthcare
AOC and Bernie are both Democratic Socialists, which in most countries would be considered center-left.
Most American carriers are garbage. American’s service is marginally better than Ryanair, but at least the latter usually costs about 30 euros for a round trip.
When flying became the basic equivalent of riding the bus. Expecting people to dress up is some classist bullshit.
Nobody cares if you think they look like a slob. I fly trans-Atlantic all the time. I sleep most of the way. Flying is not glamorous anymore. Get over it.
“its a greenhouse gas that nobody has been able to quantify how it has affects the climate.”
Everyone: “Your points don’t make sense. Here’s why.”
The 2002 VW golf had a base MSRP of $15,000, now its $21,845. Name another product (not commodity) that is getting more expensive over time.
Nitrogen oxides and methane are worse by weight, but they are emitted in such small amounts relative to carbon that their radiative forcing effect is quite small. Here’s a comparison from a recent paper:
Ah yes, Trump, the guy who pulled back from attacking Iran at the absolute last minute, the one who threatens them with destruction constantly, the one who hired John “Please let me attack Iran” Bolton - that’s the guy who will ensure we don’t end up in a war with Iran.
Keep gargling Trump’s balls, maybe senpai will notice you.
Uh oh, he’s posting Wikipedia articles that he clearly hasn’t actually read. Climate science will surely be defeated now!
Exactly. I don’t like Seinfeld’s stand up, but he’s a good interviewer.
Somehow, you seem to be under the impression that people in the scientific community haven’t read about issues in peer review, or ever heard any of the litany of pathetic objections to ACC before. Allow me to disabuse you of that hilariously incorrect notion. Scientists are not in a bubble, they just reject this…
“Trump hasn’t nuked anyone, so everything is fine.”
Lol, whatever guy. You pretty much ruin any illusion of credibility when you drop links to Breitbart. I’m sure the entire scientific community will be defeated by right wing bloggers who think that issues in peer review somehow translate to an indictment of an entire scientific field. Errors in peer review would have…
Fucking hell, you’re posting a Breitbart article to criticize peer review? What next, Infowars? Here’s a hint: the issues with peer review don’t impact climate science in the same way they do sociology or medicine. The massive datasets are built up over decades by tens of thousands of people - you can’t p-hack or game…