It occurs to me that you don’t see articles (here or elsewhere) about what’s on CBS this week. That’s probably because the network has mostly original content and what’s the point of free advertising for their network?

It: Chapter Two

Those 48 victims signed in to play a PVP game. This guy simply played that game.

I see he’s the type of quality artist who needs to label his Obama caricature.

some discussions here can be very taxing.

I am curious to know the details of what they define as “social media”.

I’m quite confused by all this. What was the whole point of this interview?

In the manner this is being used, what does a wrong ID lead to?

I think there’s a world of difference between:

A TV show?

A point about strategy...

You seem like the type of rational person who, when a terrorist drives a van into an outdoor cafe, will point to the speed limit signs.

annnnnd... watching this on the news. Maryland senator Van Hollen just used the words “thoughts and prayers” minutes after the anchors stated the police have not yet finished securing the scene.

I cited Lando and not Han because I didn’t want to derail discussing the idea of recasting with a particular recasting that seems divisive.

Going to be especially odd to hear the empty thoughts&prayers for this one.

Have we reached the point of getting congressional thoughts&prayers while the event is still happening?

Let me put it another way: Black Panther has an 8 year old who grows up to be Killmonger. They *can* use CGI to make the kid look even more like an 8 year old version of Michael B Jordan, but they don’t. Why?

The thing with Tarkin is that his face looks OK but his movements are overall very stiff. I don’t know if that was directing, or if the actor was told “don’t move your head too much, it will make the CGI overlay more difficult”.

There are plenty of examples where recasting causes no fuss. Bilbo Baggins. Lando Calrissian. All of Star Trek. No one has any trouble.

I like that theory.