Interesting take. What do you think of my ever-grey comment from elsewhere in this thread?

Not after you read my explanation elsewhere in this thread.

Say that after you read my explanation elsewhere in this thread.

Let’s avoid the regular believer vs atheist discussion.

Claiming the scientific method applies to the Creator of all that exists is logically unsound, especially given how little we know about the universe, such as the missing 5/6ths (dark matter), the “dark energy” that resists the force of gravity, and what existed before our point source origin (Big Bang).

If you want to open your mind even further, check out my explanation of creation and our place within its majesty.

which is nigh on impossible here

You’re on the right track.

Only once they connect with our Creator to begin the personal process of self-evolution beyond our vices. Societies can only be improved by individuals improving themselves.

Religion is the rules by which we can create happy societies. Part of religion is knowing that our free will is sacrosanct and that people are free to be sociopaths, i.e. there is no instant karma.

God cares, but has given us the power of free will which means we are capable of ignoring Its existence and rules for choosing good over evil.

We need to have a testable hypothesis for the scientific method to work.

because what people do in the doctors office is not for the gov to be party to. Stop. Period.

Meeting for bagels does not a love story make.

I think you should uses a more age-appropriate woman, like Helen Mirren.

I don’t believe in telling 21yo women who they can/can’t want to get with.

“Hey now! You just take your sensibility, empathy and nuance and get out of here, Mister!”

These people are right there in Dunning & Kruger’s work of genius.

What is wrong with these people?

Too many queens, not enough subjects, and very few clueful.