Yes, the Lincoln-Douglass debates were famously about how much they completely agreed with each other on abolition and were actually worried about tariffs or industrialization or whatever. So worried they were afraid to even talk about it.

No, there was no question of “preserving the union” until secession, which was explicitly a conservative move against threats to the institution of slavery. Reacting to someone’s reaction to you doesn’t make you also a reactionary, on the contrary, it means you’re staying the course.

Or, you know, if Hillary’s old head of P.R. said something hilariously ironic very publicly in response to the news this editorial is commenting on. Could be that.

You realise this argument is also a defense of Hitler, right?

That’s not accurate and you know it. The change being resisted was the end of slavery.

We very much all already live in “Conservative-Topia.”

I’m confused. Are you pretending you don’t remember your own post right now? The one I was replying to? Like you just happened to come across this out of the blue instead of posing the hypothetical it’s based on?

If a fetus is a person, then surely it’s a child and its parents are responsible for protecting it. If women can be compelled to give live birth, someone must do the compelling. He’s so negligent in checking his woman that she killed somebody in his care. Sure sounds like a crime to me.

Read the fucking article

He sure had a say in causing the pregnancy.

You should tell the Department of Defense that.

Pop quiz! Which bearded dissident told his followers that the only ethical society was one where “each give according to his ability, and take only according to his need?”

Nope nope nope. That comparison paves the road to The Hague. “Don’t murder randos on your government’s dime” was in Geneva Protocol I, back when we still thought gas attacks and torturing prisoners was good ol’ gentlemanly warfare. Don’t be worse than the guys from poetry times, man.

Youknow I’ve had these pikes lying around forever so yeah, you know what, revolution, why the hell not

Even guilty might be fine, this guy also doesn’t pay his bills

They know and they like it. It could even be an act. Ruining public schools to promote their privatization is a started goal of several members of both the administration and the Prince-DeVos family.

So like... Epiphany? Fourth of July?

I don’t know if anything has ever filed me with hate as much as this

You’ll have to learn how to do it yourself first. InfoWars has warped your idea of what skepticism is. THAT’S the dangerous political influence you need to be worried about.

Have you ever gotten a thousand t-shirt printed? ‘Cuz the kids in the Spirit Clubs at each of these schools have. Signs? Ask any athlete or Student Council veteran born after 1975 how they made that happen. Buses? Yeah, gee, where ever would students at a public school come into contact with bus drivers?