Seeing how they rally to Sanders suggest it’s not a one-issue movement.

Nobody cares

“Focus Group” is not jargon for “Lobby” in any industry, subculture, or country, past or present. You were thinking maybe of “interest group?” If it were me, I’d cut your losses and admit I misspoke. But, you know, do you.

Do you think that about politically active adults? Is it how you, personally, approach political issues that affect you?

 Get Out is about appreciating Ben Stiller? I must have seen a different cut

An engineer “plans” the software, a teamster “plans” getting plungers that were made on an assembly line “planned” by a different engineer, and “unskilled” workers mediate the gaps. Their supervisors do nothing but give them periodic, ritualized reminders that they aren’t deserving of the fruits of their own labor,…

Oh, boy, if you think that’s reason for the State of Massachusetts to revoke her credentials, just wait until you hear about the jokers pushing this thing called “psychiatry.” Or, like, neurology, oncology, or epidemiology. Inductivists! Not one of you is free of inductive reasoning! Get thee from my father’s house,…

I literally cannot imagine how you read that definition and took away “there is a monolithic scientific method, it is the same one we use currently, and it is unchanging and unerring.” Or how thinking otherwise (read: knowing the history of science or, like, anything before ~1963) means a person MUST believe in…

No

I mean, yes you absolutely can, that’s what epistemology is and without it science wouldn’t have progressed at all since the Dutch Renaissance, but that’s not actually what’s going on here

You’re delusional if that’s what you think a comments section is, and resting on people’s appreciation of Ben Stiller deep cuts for your blackface pass is just a little more than your usual tone-deaf white liberal Hollywood crap.

Having to watch “The Jazz Singer” to understand a commentary on Hollywood > assuming your audience remembers the intricacies of goddamn Tropic Thunder

I mean, it’s not like Ben Garrison could draw something that isn’t true, right?

Boo downvote

Well, this got me all hot and bothered for nothing, or visa versa. Shameful!

 Never catch Gizmodo falling for that one

He’s bringing his narrative to... syntax?

You’re playing kinda fast andlose with the word “conspiracy” here, bud. Those historical examples are some serious reaching

Mostly just racist?

Way to prove his point