Mostly? Lie detectors detect literally nothing. They are always useless. And for good reason.

We have freedom of speech here. Love THAT or gtfo of my country, ya fascist fuck.

That is indeed how need-based programs work. Are you also pissed every time you aren’t administered Narcan at the hospital just because you aren’t addicted to heroin? I take the bus to work- should I have to pay taxes if other people are just going to drive their cars all over the roads I pay for?

Yeah, we had a rash of people doing this in supermarkets last year. It was... oddly specific, for one.

Their legislators have yet to reach Salem in their covered wagons to vote, I guess?

His genitals are NEVER under two layers of clothing, and his weirdly insistent public announcement of such (Matt Weiner asked him if he could please wear underwear on set and we almost didn’t get a seventh season of Mad Men) caused a bum rush of photographers trying to establish that he is, in fact, going commando on…

Fair game under Oregon law, apparently.

“As long as they get you OK," all of these questions are legal. You are partly right, tho, using credit checks in hiring in only illegal in 10 states right now. My bad.

The would need to substantiate that such a policy existed before your termination and that they were aware of your propensity for wearing them and that they told you at the time that this was the reason for your termination, but generally yes.

That credit check thing is INSANELY illegal, criminal not so much. Education and experience, definitely not illegal, those are the questions pretty much everyone agrees they SHOULD be making their determinations on.

Oh, definitely, it just doesn't solve your unemployment problem, so most people just focus on that.

She means they'll contest your right to collect on your unemployment insurance.

Yes, but there’s a roughly 100% chance that if they’re violating labor law in the interview process, you’ll never be able to exercise any of your rights in the workplace there without fear of retaliation. Any question along the lines of “Are you married?” or “What is your religion?” is, effectively, code language for…

Given what the dude does for a living and where he does it, this does kinda seem like a very deliberate "Come at me, bro" to the right more than an actual ad.

As far as I know Medical Science’s party line on CSA is “no uniform prognosis,” and the idea that victims are more likely than anyone else to become offender themselves is unsupported by evidence and adds immeasurably to the stigma of molestation, encouraging people not to report.

... huh?

OK, because it doesn’t seem to be sinking in exactly, there is nothing even remotely literal about any of these readings of the Quran or the Bible. ISIS, Post-Millennial Dispensationalism, these are all doomsday cults with only the most superficial connection to the religions of Christianity and Islam, much less…

ding ding ding

None of what you complained about is even similar to what Steinem said or did here, tho.

Geesus, there’s so much wrong with this, but seriously, what in the world do you think “colonialism” is if you think it originated among Muslim states?