Where’s a truck’s taint? Right next to that, or in the driver’s mouth. Either way.

It’s very hard to imagine that this conspiracy didn’t extend to C-level, with the involvement of warranty concerns and repairs. How did they justify this change to those concerned with warranty repair frequency?

This is not a defense, in fact it inculpates them. The real problem is how much it would cost to bring them down in court to obtain damages, but there’s another way: