cpeng
CPEng
cpeng

Interesting. Just looked up the LT4 weight and low and behold it’s 529 lbs fully dressed. So the Cadillac weighs the same as the LT4, which is still good.

Where is it stated that the new Cadillac motor is smaller and lighter then a lt4 or lt5? The Cadillac V8 is DOHC which is much heavier in design then a pushrod motor in the case of an LT4 and LT5. And I’m sure if you add the piping and turbos they would easily outweigh a super charger.

It’s a billlet motor so no water jackets which makes it easier to chop off two cylinders.

Rotating mass doesn’t consume energy, it only stores it. The loss of energy comes from brake heat but with rengenerstive braking the wheel energy isn’t complelty wasted. Also as heavy as Teslas are the rotating mass isn’t significant.

Were the brights on? Didn’t look like it. I’ve driven many mountain roads and farm roads and if you don’t use your brights you will hit an animal.

C5 and C6 Corvettes which use the same transmission use 5th for their top speed and 6th gear allows then to avoid gas guzzler tax.

It actually is, a government deficit is not a good thing because that is a loan the tax payer has to pay back, trade deficits aren’t loans.

Tariffs hurt your economy just as much is not more then then the foreign economy. They prop up non competitive industries or in this case allow the steel industry to become uncompetitive by raising their prices. They increase the cost for the many for the benefit of the few, they make a country poorer. Trade deficits

It’s probably the styling and the 3500 lb curb weight that I don’t like. The Turbo MR2, that was the better Toyota in my opinion.

I love the NSX, and FD3S. It’s easy for me to see why those are so highly regarded. While not a fan of the Nissans it’s easy to see where they fit in. The Supra was a not an everyday supercar as the NSX, nor was it as light weight handler like the FD3S. It also didn’t have one of the first all wheel drive systems as

I guess that explains why there are no stock Supras

I don’t understand why the last gen Supra was so legendary. It’s not pretty like the 2000GT or 3rd gen RX7. It’s not especially fast in stock form. It was more expensive then a Corvette of the day with worst performance. It wasn’t popular enough to warrant a successor. It seems that it is only cool because you can

My corvette can’t make it over 45 mpg, it’s more like 22 mpg.

Is this live only?

lol

You are inferring way too much. There is no logical link between how to interpret the constitution and the change of an organization. Furthermore the constitution has changed since its inception, ie with 28 amendments over the course of 200 years, I don’t discount any of those even though they weren’t included in the

You’re comparing the NRA to our country!? Really?! The NRA is not a country!! I really don’t know how to explain it to you.

Murder by gun as you agree existed when the constitution was written, it was a public threat to safety as it is now, so I’m not sure how you reach the conclusion that the founding fathers never considered murder. Murder by gun has not gone up even with the number of AR15s in circulation. Murder rate is much lower then

I’m saying that the second amendment was included despite that fact that there is a downside to arms, namely murder. Like you said not a new concept. My point is the founding fathers would have the very same stance on the amendment today as when it was written.

Dude reading comprehension. I said they had the foresight to predict weaponry and yet they still felt it necessary to include in the constitution knowing full well arms can be used to commit murder. The constitution made the second amendment hard to change by virtue of the fact that you have to get 66% of the states