I’m not arguing that it is good to join For Britain. I am explaining their appeal to a guy like Morrissey, who’s single issue seems to be animal rights.
I’m not arguing that it is good to join For Britain. I am explaining their appeal to a guy like Morrissey, who’s single issue seems to be animal rights.
“A third and more upsetting reason: He believes in For Britain, and he doesn’t care what anyone else thinks or feels about it.”
Could be a small map and a regular sized pin.
This can be expected when they line their fields with Bolivian shale.
They want to soak their citizenry so they can spend more.
It is a recruiting magazine written for Westerner converts or Muslims who immigrated to Dar Al Kuffar (land of the infidel). If recruiting dullards is driven by foreign policy, why on earth would their recruiting tools highlight something completely different? I realize Sam Harris is polarizing, but this goes through…
So you didn’t read it?
They are numbered in order of importance and specifically say that changing foreign policy won’t stop them, only submitting to the rules and dictates of Islam or paying the Jizzyah will.
What are these policies specifically? Because I’ve read ISIS’s Dabiq article where they specifically outline, in excellently written English called “Why We Hate You”. It has almost nothing to do with foreign policy and everything to do with the UnIslamic nature of the West.
I mean she isn’t wrong if you goal is to make a war short. It is just that the level of brutality needed to make a war short contravenes pretty much every international law to make war less brutal.
A weapon made to reduce civilian casualties is the opposite of “as awful as it sounds”.
The truth about how Drew ended up in hospital is finally revealed.
Yeah, Harry Reid lobbied for this to be built then once it was built lobbied for it to never open.
The topic isn’t complex, legally. The only speech that is criminalized is direct incitement to violence or directing people to commit crimes. The direct incitement to violence ruling is super narrow has to past this test:
The inherent value is not giving the government the right to determine what is bigotry. For instance, the writers at The Root are biots. This is my opinion. If someone with my opinion, but not my principles was in power, they would be shuttered. See Pro-Palestinian or pro-Zionist media, depending on the politics of…
You realize that a person can be ideologically consistent and think both of these are bad, right? For instance, I condemn Trump trying to use the government to chill free speech while simultaneously condemning these foreign leaders and the US journalist class for doing the same. It is rather easy to be logically…
The difference is that other signatories all already have draconian speech laws. In most cases, their constitutions are ether unwritten (like in the UK) or based on positive rights, which assumes the government gives you the right to free speech and can take it away (France, Canada). In the US, our rights are negative…
Heck, you don’t even need to dick around with old engines if you want daily driver level reliability. I helped my friend swap in a Miata engine into his Triumph Spitfire. Sure it loses the excitement of your car catching on fire or not starting, but it now drives like you think a Triumph should drive based on looking…
I’m not a numbers matching queen, so any good looking car from the past that isn’t mechanically interesting will likely get an engine swap. That’s why I don’t fret about their miserable performance numbers.