No. It means that you can’t control others, but you can control yourself. It is one of the few things you have total control over.
No. It means that you can’t control others, but you can control yourself. It is one of the few things you have total control over.
Because you don’t have control of other people, but you can control your reaction to other people.
“(big skim opportunities for MAGA charities and nonprofits)“
I’ve actually done a bunch of it. With FEMA, for Sandy. The fund you are mentioning is specifically for disbursements to governments, mitigation and individuals. They are cash pass-through funds. Someone makes a claim. The organization does a background check to make sure they own the property they are claiming damage…
Without your snark, all of these are good things. Also, FEMA Disaster Relief Funds are pass through funds. They don’t go out to charities or NGOs. They go to governments, individuals, mitigation projects, and the rest are OPs and admin funding to review and facilitate the passing through of funds. You can literally…
I had a similar situation, but with a bed. They sent the wrong size and said they can’t accept beds as return items. They told me to keep them both. I ended up with a free bed which I was able to sell again.
I’ve found that calling them when they mess something up works pretty well to keep getting your prime extended for free. If something is late, write an email telling them you’ve been a prime user for X number of years and have started rethinking the utility of it because X item was late. It has worked for me.
Wait, me treating you in the same manner you treat others is cowardice? LMFAO.
I literally watched you dismiss someone responding to you in this thread explaining my post. I never said you dismissed me. I said you dismissed someone else and it wasn’t a troll post, so you can fuck off.
Sure, but seeking asylum is functionally meaningless as a metric of whether or not someone deserves asylum. So the economic migrant rate is somewhere in between 93% (7% of requests are accepted) and 10% (number of applications to be found fraudulent vs just not meeting the criteria). So 1 in 10 people are actively…
Of course. I watched you dismiss a post explaining my response. I figured once someone accepts dismissing replies, I will follow their lead.
At what point did this seem like a defense of something. I’m laughing at the obvious idea that censorship doesn’t work in the manner proponents of censorship always say it will. This has been historically illustrated throughout history.
Uh, only 7% of asylum seekers actually receive asylum. It is almost like pretty much everyone is an economic migrant which makes the entire pitch you just made a lot less emotive.
Gizmodo: We need more moderating and censorship on social media!
Uh, you can get similarly nice bags from the Johnston and Murphy outlet for $100 bucks.
Uh, you can get similarly nice bags from the Johnston and Murphy outlet for $100 bucks.
50% of immigration agents are Latino.
Yep. DHS is the department that oversees the various agencies.
That seems like it would create the opposite goal of revitalizing Detroit. Making it easy to get to a much better, far flung suburb/city, means people won’t need to move closer for work.
“So ultimately, the decision of whether to charge a mother of a young child with the misdemeanor crime of failing to enter the US through a port of entry is not necessarily going to have any effect on whether she will be detained or released once her criminal proceeding is finished and her case winds its way through…
Concerned, unconcerned, and absent?