countrymacsocularpatdown
Country Mac's Ocular Patdown
countrymacsocularpatdown

Yeah, and a bunch of restrictions means it isn’t free speech. It is substantially limited speech.

No they didn’t. He ran unopposed as in a primary and won by default.

What did the flag say?

I hope you’ve never seen a Mel Brooks movie, that would be devastating.

Have you watched the video? He literally explains that he thinks it is funny because nazis are so abhorrent. Whether or not you think he is funny, it is irrelevant to the fact that he explicitly states Nazis are bad.

Self-nominating in an unopposed primary is not electing someone to office. I could win a primary dozens of districts by just picking districts where nobody is running in the primary because the republican or democrat has no opposition.  

The joke maker would agree, given that point of the joke is that Nazis are bad and turning a cute dog into a Nazi makes it not cute anymore.

There is a literal setup on the video where he explains that he thinks Nazis are horrible and that is why he thinks it would be funny to turn the dog into a nazi. Whether or not you find that funny, any intellectually honest person can see from the intro that he doesn’t think Nazis are good.

So did this. The setup to the joke is “my girlfriend thinks this dog is the most adorable thing in the world, I’m annoyed by that so I decided to turn it into one of the worst things I can think of, a Nazi.” The entire premise is that Nazis are horrible and the dog is cute, so to ruin the cuteness, you turn it into a

No EU countries have freedom of speech compared to the US. The link you added illustrates the specific curtailing of freedom of speech in the EU. Whereas the only justification to stop speech in the US is specific incitement to violence or danger (me ordering you to kill someone or falsely shouting fire in a theater),

I can’t imagine that treated wood burns particularly clean and I can’t think of applications of old wood that involve no treatment. There may be some, but I can’t think of any.

This title is the exact opposite of what is happening. He doesn’t get his money unless he delivers. This is a smart move by the board given that if he delivers, the amount he gets paid doesn’t matter. If he doesn’t deliver, but does well, they still do well and he gets nothing. If he doesn’t do well, they’ve already

“We do find that low education of mothers, poor health, and other risk factors can explain part of these mortality differences.”

Construction recycler’s warehouses are a blast. So much neat stuff to dig through.

“But Frank’s statement is loud and clear: together, we can build better cities. Palais Récoup is just the start.”

That would literally have the exact same demand pull on animals. You’d need to people to poach or illegally hunt to create the crushed testicles. When they ran out, they would have more people poach to keep up the supply.

And they are structured in such a manner that they don’t provide transportation, they connect people with contract drivers.

They aren’t going to lose assuming their policy says that you have to accept service animals. That is part of the diabolical beauty of the not having employees, but contractors.

From my read, they used a US subsidiary of a foreign company. That is completely legal if I am reading it correctly. I currently work for a US subsidiary of a foreign country and we have something like $500 million in federal contracts.

“If this were about creating an autonomous car that is better, faster, and smarter than a human to save lives, then the companies would assume liability for these kinds of accidents.”