That’s a terrible argument. Anyone can compete in “Men’s” sports — including women. So there is no need for any limits in men’s sports. Women’s sports need limits to prevent all human beings from being eligible to compete in women’s sports.

No. Men compete in what is really the “open” division. Anyone can compete in men’s sports — including women. Women’s sports exist to allow women a place to compete without having to compete against men. Without women-specific sports, few women would compete in sports — almost no women would compete at the highest…

Bingo.

You make complete sense. Yet almost no one commenting here wants to be logical. It’s really sad.

You need to watch more basketball.

He competes in a category open to all. The women’s category is limited by definition.

Because the women’s category needs a definition to prevent all people from competing in that category.

No. That’s why there are separate catergories for men’s sports and women’s sports. Men’s sports are really “Open” sports — a woman can compete in that category if she wishes. That’s why it’s necessary to define only what qualifies someone to compete in Women’s sports. The women’s category is not “Open.”

Point #2 is wrong because it misses the point. When a pitcher finishes his motion like Maddux, he has a much better chance to move his head away from the ball than a guy who lands falling to the side. It’s not just about being able to get the glove up. Rather, it’s just like boxing. A boxer can avoid getting hit by…

That ball was not hit directly at Maddux’s face. But you’re correct in saying that he always gave himself a better opportunity to protect himself.

No one has to work at Amazon. There are plenty of companies that treat their employees very well.