The personalities in Parks and Rec were still archetypes, just not tired ones perhaps. I also found some aspects obnoxiously unrealistic (I know it's, TV; it doesn't need to be realistic). In real life, there's no way someone with Ron Swanson's view on government would support basically everything Leslie did. All…

Nope!

"End good"? Shouldn't we hold on to the little good that remains?

That's just the kind of easy, subpar material they're looking for. You're hired!

Yes, they'll continue to ignore us. That's how pride works.

Hey, I had always assumed she was the wife. Assume I don't exist!

I've adopted a new gait in her honor.

Next you're going to ask them to proofread their articles. Be reasonable!

How many more weeks of this before the top brass swallow their pride and admit defeat?

They also had a fun discussion about proof by induction. And they were the first people to take Molly's investigation seriously, which held some weight with Chief Oswalt.

Opening boxes? Is that a thing people stream? Do they know what's in the boxes? Might the contents be dangerous? I need to know more!

Marco Rubio probably hasn't even seen Insecure. Why bring him up?

Not if Lorne Malvo has any say in it.

If this article about the poor quality of faith-based movies doesn't get at least a thousand comments, it's a clear harbinger of doom for the comment section.

"right of passage"

Wait, you're Nick Saban's son? That explains…very little.

Yeah, but now there are all those casual readers scrolling from article to article past the comments! All that ad revenue should allow you to read the articles before publishing them.

LAX is my only experience in the town, but I'm pretty sure it's just "Angelenos", without the "Los". I'm not a professional writer though, and they certainly have editors here, right?

That's all I remember as well. Probably because I saw the trailer but didn't see the movie.

Look everyone, it's Finn Jones!