I've heard you can use them for making symbols plural as well, like "&'s". I still don't like it, but I think it's acceptable.

When the world needed him most, he vanished.

*fewer

(Read the article. (It's all we have left now.))

It's here…

Still?

*fewer

I sort of like MicroStation!

Bring back Spot.im!

If the movie is about the Supreme Court case itself, she wouldn't need to be pregnant. She'd given birth three months before. Although it's probably not about just the Supreme Court case, because then you wouldn't even need to cast McCorvey.

Besides the appreciation, you get to listen to good music and process the movie in a comfy seat. I don't get why more people don't stay.

Saying "respectively" is meaningless if you don't mention the parents individually.

People might criticize it because CPS will likely squander the money, or at least not use in a way that benefits the children. And that's a valid concern, but not one that should justify criticizing Chance himself. Good on him. This is the sort of private philanthropy that would behoove conservatives who seek to…

Me too. For LoveWaffle's sake, I hope he wasn't.

Or Hannibal, 12 Monkeys, Fargo…

I lIked both quite a bit. But I'd point the arrow the other way. But not because I think time goes backwards. You know what I mean.

Apparently Wikipedia hadn't seen that second article. It does say Paul McCartney is in the cast, though!

Like make it with women?

Well, so did Shakespeare.

What's the biggest drop in quality between chronologically adjacent features for a director?