Don’t care. Really, really don’t care in this instance. And, frankly, it seems silly to focus on that when the actual story is one person threatening to ruin another person’s livelihood, and making the problem of believing sexual assault victims more difficult in the process.

“The law” isn’t a singular thing, which is something you -for whatever reason-refuse to grasp. The law, by the way, IS NOT “a line separating what we ALL agree to be good and bad” (showing your fundamental misunderstanding again); it is a selection of rules determining what is CORRECT or INCORRECT. Those are very…

You’re just objectively wrong (well, depending on your definition of “asshole”, of course). Yesterday, I jaywalked on a completely empty street. That’s illegal. Am I an asshole?

1. Assholes don’t necessarily break laws.

What kind of sociopath thinks trying to kill someone over a traffic infraction is equivalent to the traffic infraction?

Five months for the drunk Kiwi isn’t enough, IMHO, but this is a very different case. Age, record, and intent (especially intent) make it a different offense and require different punishment. Awful as his crime was, I’d hope the learner in NZ can be rehabilitated. But I hope this old sociopath dies in prison.

Vigilante justice not ok on the road but why in the world to we find prison rape to be at all acceptable?

Harmlessly passing someone in a no passing zone isn’t being an “asshole” . Trying to murder two people is.

The guy should have gotten way more than five months — that said, he didn’t callously, purposefully, and with full control of his own faculties, kill those people. This guy did try to do that.

Parachute, poorly faked death.

Same interview:

I’d say she was being hypocritical if she had said that, like, yesterday.

Yep, you can’t force me to health insurance to save my life, etc. I love how the only thing that united Americans (for the most part) was no to the metric system.

But honest question, what are we going to do about it? What are the next steps here? I feel like we are shouting into a void about federal law and ethics and its making me very tired.

What would you have done? If you were staring down the barrel of a very lucrative deal and the opportunity to be the lead of a potential franchise?

Side note: Black Widow may be just a boring human, but marvel has shown that they can get behind a story with just a human (ahem Daredevil). If anything, a Black Widow movie could be a spy thriller on steroids. And people will see that. They keep seeing those Bond films- so why not a black widow movie?

Thank goodness he knows about the cyber though. Otherwise we’d be in real trouble.

And where will they find said information? There isn’t a manual written on how to be decent because it changes with the times. You’re basically like the negative stereotype of the angry wife that’s mad at her husband but won’t explain why because he should know it by himself. Unfortunately the world doesn’t work that…

Wait, what? Swinton knew and respected Cho’s work, knew that she had a strong opinion on the issue, and asked to be put in touch to understand Cho’s point of view.

Cho has made herself one of the main voices of this debate and was publicly criticizing the movie and Swinton. If someone does that, they can’t then claim that if someone wants to talk about it with them that they are being turned to as the only Asian in the room. She has set herself up as an expert on this issue for…