I think this was explained fairly accurately before...
I think this was explained fairly accurately before...
you should totally read the paper “‘SUPERSTITION’ IN THE PIGEON” by B. F. Skinner... it’s interesting and applies here :)
They’ll love these
True, you already seceded from Europe 260 years ago... we have a very long time to catch up to your stupidity :p
I don’t get how politicians of a continent-spanning federal state comprised of essentially 50 country-like entities called states somehow think it’s awesome when another federal state secedes from a forming continent-spanning federal organ. If I’m not mistaken, the last time it happened to the US, they went all Civil…
was there any sorcery in the first episode (apart from the single white walker)? I remember the first book/season being particularly non-magical except for the last chapter or so;..
what on earth does this have to do with skin color?
Not all opinions are equally valid though :)
And that’s the kind of thinking that leads to rapists not getting punished. All kinds of people can be rapists. Thinking that only violent assholes or psychopaths are racists is exactly what leads to the courts thinking: this guy doesn’t seem like a racist; surely there was a misunderstanding and not rape...
I’m asking because in this thread all that’s talked about is a sober man taking advantage of an inebriated woman. Guess what: the man can be drunk too. Being drunk changes the situation.
I’m not one to challenge the consentisliketea idea, but have you tried to serve tea when you’re on the verge of black-out-drunk yourself?
If both are intoxicated, can the man drag the woman before court since she clearly raped him? He couldn’t consent because he was drunk. Or does rape only work one way?
Oh please, what crap is this?
Lol, public transportation smells like a farm though :p
Thanks for the civilized talk by the way :)
then I can honestly say that I think we mostly agree :)
Human pup here, know a lot of other human pups, none of us think that. Media wil sensationalize and look for the examples that are the easiest to do so with...
They show stupid examples in this video (like nipping at someone’s shirt at work, wtf!), but in my experience a)human pups generally keep it restricted to the bedroom, specific parties/conventions/places where that is ok. b) it’s part of their identity, and that is what they want accepted.
Lol, Human pup here, and I hadn’t heard about “otherkin” before now. Quick look on wikipedia to read what it is, and my reaction is: “hell no!” lol. Otherkin sounds like a lot of mumbo-jumbo. And that’s coming from me. Haha. But hey, to each his own :)
Every other pup I’ve talked to agrees that “nipping” at people in the workspace is very, very clearly crossing boundaries that are not ok. Like always in these mediatized stories it’s sensationalized. This is like making a documentary about trans people, and shoosing the mtf trans woman who shows her boobs to everyone…