Agreed completely. All of these trucks look unfortunate (though endearing) with tiny tires on them. That’s not the issue with the new Blazer. The issue with the new Blazer is it’s not a truck, it’s a car.

S-10 referring to the platform, not necessarily the official model designation. Both generations of S-10 Blazer were capable body on frame trucks, like their full size relatives.

You can make fun of the S-10 Blazer but it was body on frame, rugged, and off road capable in certain trims. The new Blazer is none of those things.

Which is an incredibly common story up there. The people in this thread pushing for retaining the blight have clearly not spent time in Detroit.

I think some of the recent vitriol pertains to the amount of content we get before Devs give up. Battlefield 2 had 15 maps in 2005, and expansions ended up totalling 30 maps by 2009. The game received multiple expansions over the course of 5 years. Every succeeding Battlefield game has had fewer and fewer maps, amd…

It was in good shape up until FIAT bought the Chrysler assets creating FCA. That building was abandoned and squatters (assholes) raped and pillaged everything from the interior. Its apparently gutted of plumbing, wiring, or anything of value.

Was Mercenaries 2 ever popular? The PC port never worked. The original Mercenaries is still a masterpiece though.

Still don’t understand how we could go from the pinnacle of NASCAR games with the PS2 era EA Nascar Thunder series, 03-06 specifically, and nearly 20 years later the best anyone could come up with is an unplayable mess.

Less disgusting than F1 drivers drinking milk out of a shoe 🤮

Counter take: The Xbox One X was the turnaround Microsoft needed. It showed that they were serious in competing in the 4K space, with the UHD BluRay player and the ability to deliver a solid 30FPS. It has similar, and sometimes better, performance than the newer Xbox Series S. Its still my primary console, and I still…

This is the correct take. Also, good to see you’re still here, Wes. 

That’s still a personal luxury touring car, albeit heavy on the luxury side and light on the touring. The original two seater convertible was heavy (particularly front heavy) compared what would be considered a “sports car” at the time. It was faster in a straight line though.

It was always a personal luxury touring car. Even from its original inception.

If the guy’s name is Allcock, it makes complete sense. Just like if you said your number was 1-800-MyKinja.

If that’s the case, its not a real phone number, its a joke about people calling him all the time. “If you need anything, call me anytime! 1-800-ALLCOCK” I imagine his real phone number would be in his email signature as well. Allcock being his name is the only thing that make sense.

Alcohol and tobacco related…

It makes sense if it’s the guys name.

Considering “Allcock” is an actual name, that’s the only situation that makes sense here. And if it’s his actual name, how is it a big deal? 

The insinuation is that people wouldn’t want the “base model” because its somehow some sort of penalty box. Even being “the cheapest one” its pretty close to fully loaded. It just so happens the equipment people want is standard. Are you suggesting that even if it has nearly everything people desire in an uplevel…

Is there even a such thing as a base model nowadays?

The entry level XL trim has power windows, power locks, cruise control, air conditioning, AM/FM, infotainment (android auto/carplay), push button start. What else do you really need?

Its rated at 15/19 with the EFI 300.