1989 Ford Thunderbird SC

Wrong. The higher trim levels in '78 had the square headlights, whereas the Custom trim was the one with the round lights. All of them had square headlights in '79.

A sedan has a B pillar. If it has a B pillar, its a two door sedan.

You're not crazy. They were just underpowered for the time and too expensive. Nobody was going to pay $50k for a 2 seater in 2002. In 2003 they got a power increase.

V6 NA with 5sp swap, SC roll bars, and Eibach progressive rate lowering springs. Its 200+ lbs lighter than an SC so it actually handles better. While there's times I'd like the blower, its hard to beat the handling,given the independent rear suspension and everything.

I drive an '89.

I care! I care plenty! I just don't know how to make them stop!

Phoenix? A bird that comes back from the dead?

Could it be?

You've seen the Chinese one, right?

S550 for the realistic answer.

Ford has had the opportunity for the last 25 years if they wanted to with MN12, and later DEW98. The latter of which underpins the Jaguar XF.

They didn't talk about how much the Mustang or Espirit cost either. It just had to be interesting and have a v8.

Both the original 300 and the Cadillac STS were released for the 2005 model year. However the second generation 300 looks much more like the STS than the original 300 did. The STS had that rear end design 10 years ago.

Cadillac STS?

For reference:

When did he make fun of the Falklands War?

The name makes the joke...

Pep Boys

Did you read that Car and Driver link? The last page shows displaying better roadholding than the MUCH lighter 325is.

Now if they could produce an SVT Bronco

It has more torque and better chassis design. It out handled and E30, let alone an E24:

How about the BMW M6 fighter? Inspired by its styling as well as engineering. With its supercharged engine, independent rear suspension, and rear wheel drive, it was benchmarked against the outgoing M6. It beat it in every way.