“Natural gas produces 33% of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation,”

China has the largest trade union in the world, the ACFTU. I don’t understand the problem.

“Using mature tech lowers costs and increases reliability.”

The RC is IS based... The RC has a slightly shorter wheelbase and a slightly longer body. It borrows some of it’s front end from the GS. 

So really, you have no idea, do you?

Nah, using Mustang design language as sport cues is good. Using Raptor design cues to denote ruggedness on other models is also good. Ford’s general design language is meh at best. Using actual good design language in their stable is good.

It would follow that you’d be able to see it in others. Self awareness tends to be the problem.

It was rumored to be the Mach 1 for a while, now it’s rumored to be the Mach E. Neither of those have been set in stone. 

Zing!

They really should find a different horse term to use with it’s own logo, like they do with the Bronco.

Yeah, but I don’t really think cribbing from the Mustang is a problem. Using “Mach” seems like a minor sin as far as that goes.

To be clear, we don’t know what it’ll be called. It’ll be Mustang-inspired, but might not actually carry the name.

I’m sure you think you do.

The Durango is 14" taller, even adjusting for ground clearance.

The question basically always goes to what the seating position feels like, which is the real reason crossovers exist. 

It’s always adorable when you trot this out which just makes it look like you don’t know the word crossover, which is what the article refers to, and don’t understand what the “sport” in SUV refers to. 

I bet it seems more rampant when you don’t even know what it is.

I’m sorry this is happening to you. 

I bought a Toyota last weekend, the dealer had two in the showroom. 

No one thinks it’s a huge hurdle, but small things can be enough to modify a lot of behavior.