That last clause is even more important than the first one. The 2-3 documented concussions are bad; the very nature of life as an NFL player is much worse. Every NFL player is facing this risk regardless of their concussion track record, and it's worse for guys in the trenches. The science is almost indisputable at…

You're the worst kind of human.

Fuck the team. Seriously, fuck the team, he owes them less than nothing.

Just out of curiosity, how well do you know the guy? Like, on a personal first-name basis?

You're not sure that science supports the idea that a guy with two documented concussions and a suspected third one is at a high risk of suffering brain injury when he has a job that asks him to slam his head into objects at high speed hundreds of times a year?

You don't want crippling trauma that'll affect you for decades? Hah, you must be a woman.

How is not wanting to suffer from repeated head trauma "PC" exactly?

Let's be clear here, when people say someone is only a rookie in the NFL, what they really mean is this person had about a decades worth of padded athletes bashing them in the head. My younger brother played 4 years on both sides of the ball IN HIGH SCHOOL and he still deals with the after effects on his body.

The 49ers could and would have cut him tomorrow if they found a comparable player who could save them a dollar. The players owe no loyalty to the teams.

Doesn't he know Goodell loves his employees and is doing extensive research on concussion prevention? Who wouldn't trust a man of Roger's integrity?

Hey dog, maybe read the damn article before dropping haut taeks.

I know, he didn't even realize that you'd wipe his ass when he was 45 and in a wheelchair.

Yea! How dare he be concerned about his own health!

Same as GinAndTonic, you are not a nag for that. He is a pee-monster. He's gaslighting you over him fucking peeing on the floor. YOU ARE NOT A NAG.

You are not crazy for asking an adult man to not pee on the floor. And if he does, he needs to clean up his human waste. That is disgusting.

Um, he's being a fucking animal, and you should not stand for this.

Well it can be tricky. But really, passengers aren't there to get a date, just a flight. The employee did use his position to get intimate access to her that he would not have otherwise had. A mild if uninvited overture is not necessarily harassment but if you throw in a violation of trust and privacy, especially in a…

Well it is a violation of privacy. I worked for a great airline for 3 years. If an employee had taken a passenger's contact info from their file and used it for any communication that wasn't about airline stuff without the passenger's consent to do so they would have received an official reprimand and a note in their…

Sexual harassment is a broader term than literal sexual advance. That complaint stems from an unsolicited violation of privacy and personal space. The employee used information that he is supposed to use strictly for work purposes (notify the passenger of... whatever related to their flight), to try and force his way…

Dude, I know it sounds terrible, but I use the same tactics with my 2 year old as I do my dog.