My dad and stepmother did this. All 48 states. They hated it. And each other. Got a divorce afterwards.

And a thousand voices cried out in unison, the same but different all the same. “Cum on my face to unleash the hellscape that is Lucifer’s reign!” they beckoned, demanded, pleaded. All at once, deafening. I complied. I came. So will he.

Honestly, I think she does it because of the massive amounts of hate they receive. The more she can be out there, humanizing them, the better.

I love her. That is all.

Strange how people never write into advice coulmns to say “yeah, I don’t have any questions, I just wanted to say my life is awesome. So yay!”

If treating others like human beings come so unnaturally to you that you *have* to walk on eggshells and constantly self-edit in order to do it, that itself indicates a bit of a problem, don’t you think?

So, your solution to the problem of tech not being able to retain female employees is telling the female employees that they are the problem and are being babies? Someone is being childish here, but I think you need to look in the mirror. Not being able to say whatever you want, the way a toddler does, is truly being…

FROM software presents: Kart Souls.

I would suggest that people dislike the ending not because the plot is wonky (most time travel plots are) but because there was a massive tonal and thematic shift in the final act. Please read my above comment comparing 2001 and Interstellar. The issue isn't that those of us that dislike the ending are either…

2001 isn't a cult classic. It's universally acknowledged to be one of the finest examples of visionary cinema ever filmed. There's not a single wtf moment in 2001 that compares with the absurdity of Nolan's "quantifiable love" McGuffin.

Huh? The Apollo rocket uses so much fuel because it has to carry so much fuel. They could have used that rocket to carry 10 additional supplies of fuel for that tiny little space plane. I understand the almost out of fuel when they are in another galaxy but the plane is right next to Earth at the beginning. Just…

That's not why they did that though. That's a retcon. They did the apollo thing to have that epic visual shown in Imax, a "once more we leave Earth" epic scene. They didn't need that for the other planets, so they ignored it. That's the real reason. It was plot service, nothing more.

How dare they have a different opinion about a movie from yours!

Oh and why did Matt Damon's character feel like he needed to kill everyone to get onto the ship? He could have just told them he lied about the planet being habitable when they arrived, it's not as if they would have just left him there out of spite. They'd already lost crew members on the original retarded landing so…

So we need powerful rockets with tons and tons of hydrogen fuel to escape Earth's atmosphere. Did we mention that the journey from Earth was going to be a one way trip due to the amount of resources it takes to launch into space?

That was the most stupid line ever. When I saw that scene I sank in my seat in utter disappointment about this movie.

Which is the real point of divergence between 2001 and Interstellar: from the beginning, 2001 telegraphed that there would be abstractions and metaphors and ideas that were not supposed to be strictly comprehended. That were at best far outside our own scientific ken and at worst straight up magic. It intentionally…

I was the opposite, I thought the first 2/3rds was pretty good and when he flew into the black hole and didn't get spaghettified, I wanted to stop watching but I decided to just bear with it. Worst mistake ever.

For me, even the science was bad.

"...And a Baked Potato"