You’re correct that serial killers tend to pick victims from their own ethnic group.

Maybe we’ll be as great as Somalia or the Congo soon!

I think if you look into it, serial killers tend to kill people of their own ethnicity.  It’s not universally true, of course, but I think that’s a basic profiling start.

I think you’re right. I think the author believes that the quantity of victims this guy had should make him more famous than Dahmer or Bundy which, frankly, is a dumb idea.

If blacks are 13% (roughly) of the US population, but 38+% of serial killers, then what’s that mean to you?

It’s been fun, negro, but I’m outta here! Have fun reading all the white nigger stuff. Pretty entertaining and informative, if you can keep from crying while you read it.

I have to admit, I love how oppressed US blacks feel and how sensitive they are to their favorite word. Unfortunately, no one else seems to feel that same way.

They do, actually.

It is fine. Calling you a white nigger isn’t a racial slur. It’s quite common in the UK. The fact you can’t handle it is your problem.

White nigger is a racial slur?  On what race?  Elvis Costello used it in a song and the world gets on OK.  The fact US blacks can’t handle the word in any context doesn’t mean the rest of the world needs to limit their vocabulary out of fear of offending them.  Get over it.

Awwwwww . . . “Darth Credence” thinks I’m a racist. I’m truly hurt! Really!

Ah, the “Reddit Scholar” now claims “I still know the book better than you do, and it’s still a big load of conflating things that aren’t the same to try and cover for the inherent racism”, whatever that means. I guess the authors are infected with the omnipresent “inherent racism” US blacks seem to see everywhere? I…

You can keep claiming I haven’t read the book, but I can come up with what it talks about better than you can.

. . . says the guy that hasn’t read the book he complains of but desperately wants everyone to think he has.

Uh, no. I don’t go tot Reddit for history lessons, but I’m sure your open admission you do explains why you’re so horribly ignorant of your own country’s history.

The lasting impacts of slavery definitely varied based on the color of the slave.  No doubt about that.  But that’s not what the legislators in the blog were discussing.  The one that said that economics drove the demand for slaves, not racism, was correct.

It’s about slavery in America, true. But Americans (or colonists prior to the forming of the nation) enslaved all kinds of people, including other whites, native americans, etc.

LMAO - That link is pulled directly from the same blog you’ve pulled all your other information from! All you have to do is click the link from this part of it and, voila, you get your latest “find” you claim you always knew about.

We never should have funded the shitholes to begin with.  

Well, if you’re trying like Hell to bring a baby into Appalachia, lukewarm tubs are best. I knew a guy from there once, he called everyone “Pap” for some reason, and he acted as a mid-wife at some local diner there until he died in a horrible roadside accident.