We are just commentators on the internet, and even this blog writer will be quickly forgotten, but in 100 years when your great grandkids are wondering what the fuck we were thinking during 50 years of not prioritizing climate change, they would be embarrassed by your hatred of Bernie.

consequently, you’ve made it in America

You are a shill

Counterpoint - 1) Eli’s dad is rich, and 2) Eli is white male. 1+2= neverhavetoworryaboutanythingyourwholelife

Dude... all I did was explain the chart to you guys. That the figures did not represent hours of sunlight, but instead the amount of energy delivery expressed as a unit (kWhr), which confused OP into saying there were only 4-5 hours of sun in a given day, which is wrong and confusing.

Shut up, asshole

So the guy who is telling everyone that PV isn’t cost effective, despite it being one of the fastest growing industries in the US and world-wide..... designs traditional electric systems.

Whelp, perhaps you should consider the factors outside your control when internet comment section designing a plan for Puerto Rico. Some of those factors might be things like, in some hard to imagine hypothetical —- if we have a massive storm and there are delays in shipping and receiving, how will we keep food cold…

If you had invested your money in Tesla a few years ago in the battery technology that doesn’t work for anyone and is not cost effective, you could quit your job as a cad designer.

Were you also the electric cars will never work guy?

we get it. you don’t punch nazis

Bingo. This is just click bait. The real president is the dollar bill, and Mr. Starr isn’t going to let thoughtful reflection get in the way of that.

Wait, so you’re saying that a politician who doesn’t change his BELIEFS ON GOVERNANCE makes him a bad politician? Because... it seems like the absolute opposite is more arguable. Seems like all the other politicians change positions based on who is writing the checks... and it seems like you’ve been fed some silly…

lol... you’re dismissing his comments but then screenshotting them and replying to yourself.

Yeah, or this article is click-bait. Some data analysis says Bernie Sanders gets a lot of clicks, so our noble blogger above takes a quote that could be misconstrued, misconstrues it, and BOOM. Work done for the day!

I am getting batteries right now, actually (now that the system is paid off).

No, I am not arguing that the IEEE is wrong. What I am arguing is that you don’t really understand what you are talking about. The IEEE chart doesn’t say what you think it says. Now you’ve googled it and figured out the difference between your original “It isn’t that solar is bad, it is that solar only works, on…

You don’t understand the chart the first guy posted either. The chart is not telling you how many hours of “useful light” exist. It is telling you, as I already reiterated, how many kWhrs a day a 1 meter area receives (on average over a year).

Why would I apologize for pointing out that you were confidently proclaiming totally inaccurate information, and then when challenged, backing it up by evidencing a chart you clearly didn’t understand, all while attempting to stan for fossil fuel reliance using bad math and gunslinger cocksuredness?