cohaagen
Cohaagen
cohaagen

Maybe I’m wrong, but Maurice really looked like he had a slight smirk through the whole thing, and was clearly saying some heavy stuff for effect. It almost looked like he was enjoying himself, which is why the ref reacted the way he did. Maybe that’s just me.

Wow. That’s something.

This is somewhat unrelated, and maybe pertains to a different, future guide - but I was overly truthful at the beginning of my relationship that any infidelity would cause the relationship to end. Without a doubt. I wouldn’t stay. This did a couple of things:

She’s right about housing the mentally ill in a prison that isn’t built to accommodate their special needs. Rikers simply isn’t capable, from facilities on down to staffing, to handle such inmates.

Wow. He looks like Roger Goodell’s dad.

I suffered from a devastating blood clot (leading to a DVT and massive bilateral pulmonary emboli) at a rather young age. The clot was a product of trauma, and I only tested positive for one (rare) clotting factor. Not the dreaded “factor 5.” It really seems like Bosh has a chronic clotting condition. But two things

Ah yes, it’s the Republican’s fault. Thanks for allowing me to skip the rest of the piece, write this comment, and not even bother with the rest of it.

Oh for fuck’s sake. Why do you even bother doing this?

What exactly is “it,” here, that Cam Newton is having “both ways”? And what are the two ways he’s having it? From here it sure looks like he’s having two its (success, and defeat) one way (how Cam Newton wants to have them, without much regard for how well he conforms to anybody else’s notion of propriety). Which is

Can’t disagree with any of that, though my main question is about how this rule would have applied. I didn’t think an “unsportsmanlike conduct” was charted as a personal foul, because that could be something silly like kicking the ball after a first down. Changes the assumptions a bit.

I want to give Newton the benefit of the doubt on this play, but a bouncing football is a complete toss-up to be recovered. It’s pure luck where it will go, what it will do, and who gets there first. When you see it, you lunge at it instinctively. I think he out-smarted himself here, and looked bad for it. I am not a

I’m probably wrong here since it’s been reported anywhere, but I thought Talib’s first penalty was “taunting,” which isn’t announced as a personal foul. Which would suggest that he wouldn’t have been kicked out of the game after his second, obvious personal foul. Or I guess “unsportsmanlike conduct” is the same thing

Well said.

I’m really not sure what you expect him to do, and it’s awfully presumptuous to assume this is Manziel’s all-time low, considering his current trajectory.

I hope Christoph Waltz plays him (as a villain) in the movie about his life.

Meanwhile they literally ripped the Dodgers away from McCourt because the team became the bastard child of a contentious divorce. These fart clowns end up half a bill in the hole on a ponzi scheme, squander the business they’re actually good at, and still maintain control over a professional sports team in the most

Regardless of the reasoning, he has to sit for at least 10 games. Your focus here is to protect the referees and simultaneously remind the players that they’re off limits no matter what. You don’t want to make an example of someone who was suffering from brain trauma, but he did in fact stay in the game. We have to

1. I think you’re being too fair to Carey. I’m sure it’s hard for him, and he has to work out the kinks. But the man is spectacularly bad at assessing on-the-field calls. There was one segment they called him in for (forget the game, a player got the ball at the one and went into the end zone with momentum, I think)

Who is making this argument?