Or when Melania Trump said what Michelle Obama said? Twice?

Mr Obama gave warning of the possible consequences. “We could, obviously, destroy North Korea with our arsenals,” he told CBS News. “But aside from the humanitarian costs of that, they are right next door to our vital ally, [South] Korea.”

Obama and Clinton said—- oh, lord, why bother? It’s AVC, so I know there are other grownups with long-term memory...

Way to completely clip a few words out of context to try to prove your point. Here is the actual quote:

I mean, he’s verifiably disjointed. Here’s a wonderful quote of his keeping his thoughts on track to make sense of something complicated:

Sure thing, let’s see what the guy who “knows words, has the best words” had to say today:

And as everybody knows all presidents are drugged.

“Orange man say it like is. Me prefer. Hail flag! Hail orange man!”

‘Context’ is the welfare office where snowflakes go to get their handouts of liberal lies and fake news.

Why, “equal opportunity offender” is code for “both sides” false equivalency.

Oooooh, the truncated quote removal of context counter argument technique.

We never had a white supremacist buffoon in office before now. America is a global embarrassment the longer this fool is in office. Every time he opens his mouth, he’s either putting us in danger or lowering our standing on the World’s stage.

So, you’re regressing to a full on fantasy world in order to keep pretending trump isn’t a clusterfuck? Yeah, that seems consistent.

In fairness, taking quotes out of context is one of the few fallacies with equal opportunity offenders. That said, it tends to lean more right-wing just because they seem to control the biggest slice of the “stupid sh*t said on the internet” pie.

Geez, it’s almost like Trump supporters don’t understand the basics of diplomacy, or understanding quotes in full context. But that can’t be true, right?

Oh fuck you, you out of context taking motherfucker.

But we could, obviously, destroy North Korea with our arsenal. This is a factual observation. And referring to the country continuing in its current form is clearly referring to regime change. And both of those statements sound like things adults might say, as opposed to unhinged taunts laced with childish nicknames…

Yeah, because context doesn’t matter! ::eyeroll::

“We could, obviously, destroy North Korea with our arsenals. But aside from the humanitarian costs of that, they are right next door to our vital ally, Republic of Korea . . . One of the things that we have been doing is spending a lot more time positioning our missile defence systems, so that even as we try to…

Not angry at all. Just disappointed in a fellow American who apparently can’t see through the orange clown’s bluster. What you’re quoting is a simple statement of fact, but it was not delivered as a threat. It was not said to intimidate or threaten during a speech on a world stage delivered by an incompetent leader…