While secretly getting lipo, I’m sure.

Exactly. He’s like all those other horrible skeevy men who thinks the cashier or server or clerk or doctor, or actor, or salesperson or whatever job the woman has is ‘totally into him’ because she was literally just doing her job.

He had HOW MANY kids over how many YEARS with this mentally-ill woman who has survived CPS investigations?! He lost custody because he’s utter, absolute garbage himself.

It just added another layer of douchebag to him, didn't it? Before I thought "why did she agree to drinks with him in the first place?" When the answer was "she was literally paid to be in the same room as him" it explained her "interest" and made him somehow even more pathetic than standard Piers Morgan, if that was…

Yes. He, a media person, apparently had the exact same casual media interactions with another cast member during the same Suits media PR tour but those exact same casual media interactions with the man were “business” and not “leading him on” ...somehow.

The most hilarious thing I’ve read is someone who said that “meeting up for drinks” might have just been “attended a PR event for Suits at the same time.”

Usually the fathers don’t fight for it is why, not some sort of bias against men. At least that’s what I’ve gathered from people in the system.

“All of my children have a Black father,” Lynching Linda continued. “That’s a term I’ve heard them use all my life.”

Good on Mia Farrow for adopting ten children, some of whom were severely disabled, so she had 14 children, some of whom were very special needs, to raise, to give attention and be attentive to? Seriously?

Thank you for finally adding some common sense to this ridiculous discussion.

Soon-Yi destroyed her family and betrayed her sister for a dirty old man. Anyone supporting Allen at this point is a fool - his own movies have always shown he was a sexual deviant, and he was getting counselling for his inappropriate actions (PLURAL) toward Dylan before they were ever made public. I wasn't sure of…

I don't think Mia's behaviour here has any bearing on whether or not Dylan is telling the truth. There are certainly other cases where a father or stepfather molested a daughter and the mother blamed the daughter for "seducing" him. It's a very weird and horrible coping mechanism, but it in no way means that Woody…

Very, very accurate. Kids in an already unstable and/ or abusive environment are much easier targets. And it gives the abuse greater plausible deniability- 'oh no, you can't believe his/her claims of molestation- they're just messed up in the head and seeking attention because of these other problems in the home...'…

"Empty Nester"? WTF? So now we have labels for women whose children are old enough to leave home?

Look, if you're super rich and have a big enough heart to adopt a bunch of kids who probably have a very low chance of being adopted in the first place, then good on you.

Is this supposed to be in Woody's favor, because…

I dislike the "crazy child collector" narrative because it sets up a weird false equivalency between Woody and Mia where it's too easy to throw up our hands and say the whole thing is a weird family situation. "So, Mia took in several disabled children, BUT SHE PROBABLY JUST DID IT FOR ATTENTION! She's crazy! Can't…

I'm utterly baffled as to this article's agenda. Particularly as I'm fairly certain a previous article made it clear that none of this was relevant.

Because if you have bad mother, that means it's impossible to be raped? Most molesters actively seek out children who have no one to protect them.

Yeah I don't know how I would handle my boyfriend of over a decade leaving me for my adopted daughter.

I'm not particularly sure what the purpose of this is. Is this another "Mia Farrow is a crazy child collector" article? Cause it seems pretty heavy on criticizing Mia.